News Reader.info

Byline Times Free News SiteByline Times Digital / Print EditionSubscriptions + BookshopFree from fear or favour

No tracking. No cookies

SubscriptionsSectionsFactArticles predominantly based on historical research, official reports, court documents and open source intelligence.ArgumentHonestly held opinions and provocative

argument based on current events or our recent reports.ReportageImmersive and current news, informed by frontline reporting and real-life accounts.CultureHistory, music, cooking, travel,

books, theatre, film – but also with an eye on the ‘culture wars’, nationalism and identity.CategoriesDemocracyUK PoliticsConservative PartySocietyMediaNewspapersPublic HealthBrexitForeign

AffairsColumns & InvestigationsEditorialWar in UkraineThe Climate EmergencyByline Times‘ coverage of the consequences of, and responses to, the climate crisisDemocracy in DangerThe

newspaper’s extensive reporting and analysis of the various threats to democracy from populism, oligarchy, dark money and online disinformation.The Cost of Living CrisisByline Times

investigates the causes and consequences of Britain’s biggest recession for 30 yearsThe Crisis in British JournalismByline Times investigates media monopolies, their proximity to

politicians, and how the punditocracy doesn’t hold power to accountIdentity, Empire and the Culture WarByline Times explores the weaponisation of Britain’s past as a key tool in a dark

project of division and distractionThe Coronavirus CrisisByline Times exposes the Government’s dangerous ‘herd immunity’ approach towards the Coronavirus pandemic, as well as how

incompetence and conspiracies contributed to the UK’s shocking death tollCronyism and CorruptionByline Times uncovers the nepotism that greases the wheels of British politics.Russian

InterferenceByline Times leads the way in exposing the anti-democratic influence of the Kremlin over the affairs of other nationsA Hostile EnvironmentJournalists & AuthorsStuart SprayFizza

QureshiDavid HenckeThomas PerrettRevd Joe HawardStaff Writers & ColumnistsHardeep MatharuAdam BienkovJosiah MortimerNafeez AhmedPeter JukesStephen ColegraveRachel DonaldDateThis yearLast

yearAbout & ContactAbout Byline TimesContact Byline TimesSubscribe & Support UsSubscriptionsGift cardsBuy back issuesBuy BooksCrowdfund campaignLog in to your accountIdentity, Empire & the

Culture WarCrisis in British JournalismWar in UkraineClimate EmergencyIsrael-Gaza ConflictInstitutionalising IslamophobiaSearch Subscriptions

Argument & ReportageBoris Johnson’s Hard Brexit & Democracy in DangerThe Populist Alliance: How Vote Leave Came to Rule British Politics Even despite the resignation of Lord David Frost, the

hard Brexit project has been enshrined into Britain’s political institutions with far-reaching consequences, says former Labour MP Ian Lucas

Ian Lucas21 December 2021Michael Gove and Boris Johnson on the morning after the 2016 EU Referendum. Photo: PA Images/Alamy Your support matters:

Sign up to emails

Subscribe to Byline Times

SHARE THIS:

MailTwitterFacebookThreadsBlueskyThe Populist AllianceHow Vote Leave Came to Rule British PoliticsEven despite the resignation of Lord David Frost, the hard Brexit project has been enshrined

into Britain’s political institutions with far-reaching consequences, says former Labour MP Ian LucasShareEmailTwitterFacebook In the curious political landscape we now populate – still

dominated by the Coronavirus pandemic – there are many who urge us to move on from the ghosts of Brexit.

The Labour Party, so deeply scarred by its supporters’ divisions on the issue, now talks of seeking to define a new working relationship with our European neighbours rather than revisiting

past arguments. For Boris Johnson personally, Brexit is the useful comfort blanket that he cannot let go of – it was, after all, the policy that made him Prime Minister; a strategy he opted

for after writing two newspaper columns including one on the benefits of remaining in the EU.

Michael Gove, on the other hand, was always a Brexit zealot. The Cabinet minister closest to Rupert Murdoch and News Corporation, he shares Murdoch’s longstanding and fundamental disdain for

the EU, and was able to persuade Johnson that his ambitions were best served by joining the Vote Leave campaign.

When that campaign delivered a win, Johnson hoped that the Vote Leave alliance would take him immediately to Downing Street. His hopes were dashed, however, by the “mendacious” Gove – in the

words of David Cameron – who, rather than joining Johnson’s 2016 leadership campaign, announced that “Boris cannot provide the leadership or build the team for the task ahead”.

It was a devastating, though temporary, blow for Johnson. The interregnum under Prime Minister Theresa May proved brief and both Johnson and Gove resolved, ultimately, that both of their

ambitions would be best served by re-assembling the Vote Leave team, including Gove’s close advisor Dominic Cummings. Curiously, Gove’s 2016 criticism of Johnson bears an uncanny resemblance

to recent criticism of Johnson by Cummings.

Johnson and Gove were determined to build a Vote Leave Government, undaunted by the 2018 finding by the independent elections watchdog, the Electoral Commission, that their campaign had

broken electoral law in securing its 2016 EU Referendum victory.

Cummings was so determined to avoid answering questions that he refused to give evidence to the Commons’ Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) Committee inquiry on disinformation and fake

news – for which he was found in contempt of Parliament.

Nonetheless, Johnson was equally determined that the actions of Cummings and Vote Leave should not be scrutinised by the committee, resisting a 2019 call by parliamentarians to instruct his

closest advisor to explain his actions. On the contrary, individuals such as Matthew Elliott, Vote Leave’s CEO, were rewarded by Johnson as Prime Minister with key advisory roles in his new

Vote Leave Government.

Despite the resignation of arch-Brexiter Lord David Frost this weekend, relinquishing his role as chief Brexit negotiator, this process has continued to the present day. Just a fortnight

ago, Johnson appointed Gisela Stuart, previously placed in the House of Lords by the Prime Minster, to oversee the ‘independence’ of civil service appointments.

Baroness Stuart was a central component of the Vote Leave operation as a member of the organisation’s finance sub-committee. Thus, she was one of a very small group of people who, in June of

2016, was consulted internally to approve a payment to the Vote Leave campaign’s offshoot, BeLeave, of hundreds of thousands of pounds – effectively evading electoral spending limits. She

approved the payment personally – a payment later found by the Electoral Commission to be unlawful.

Johnson is assiduous in rewarding former Labour supporters – such as Stuart – who helped the Conservatives to win a majority in 2019. Former Labour MPs Ian Austin and John Woodcock have been

rewarded for their support of Johnson by also being appointed to the Lords. Their role is crucial in bolstering Johnson in former Labour areas.

By contrast, the Prime Minister’s treatment of his opponents in the Conservative Party has been ruthless. Former ministers and respected moderates such as Ken Clarke, Nicholas Soames, David

Gauke and Dominic Grieve have all had their political careers ended in Johnson’s determined quest for a hard Brexit.

Brexit Patronage Ultimately, Boris Johnson seeks to build a populist alliance, rather than a Conservative project.

His interventionist approach – involving heavy state spending and higher taxes – is anathema to the neoliberal convictions of Thatcherite Conservatives. Again, Michael Gove has been central

to this drive, who is now in charge of ‘levelling up’.

Gove is a master of cynical politics. Levelling up is, nominally, the replacement for the rules-based EU regional aid system but appears to be motivated more by US-style ‘pork-barrel’

political payments. Additionally, in his Cabinet Office role, Gove has sought to reduce the powers of the Electoral Commission, ceding its powers to a parliamentary committee with a

Government majority – some say in response to the watchdog’s findings against Vote Leave.

Vote Leave’s illegal payment was made to BeLeave’s campaign director, Darren Grimes, who has also been in the news again recently. His role in Vote Leave’s success, via its Brexit ally

BeLeave, has given him celebrity political status. He has now been appointed as a presenter for GB News, the right-wing media channel founded by Andrew Neil – who has since left the

broadcaster in a very public spat about its future direction and journalistic quality.

GB News has also emerged from the populist agenda – criticising the traditional broadcasters for failing to reflect the post-Brexit settlement. Certainly, the channel continues to be

supported strongly by Johnson’s Government and is used regularly by his ministers who will, no doubt, be at ease on-air with the inexperienced Grimes. Indeed, he is rather more experienced

in providing support for Johnson’s political agenda than in holding him to account.

This populist agenda extends to the rule of law, and plans to sideline the European Convention on Human Rights. Populist governments have little patience for independent scrutiny by courts,

Parliament or regulators – and the Vote Leave regime conforms to this rule.

Such independent regulatory scrutiny was evident in the initial actions of the former Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham in seizing information from the disgraced data analytics firm

Cambridge Analytica in 2018. This act was crucial in exposing Facebook’s abuses of data and changing how we think about social media and political campaigning.

However, Denham concluded a long-delayed investigation into allegations of illegal data-sharing by the Leave campaign, late in 2020, with a brief decision that she would take no further

action. As a former member of the DCMS Committee who had relied on her work, I was puzzled.

When subsequent evidence emerged of additional links between Cambridge Analytica and Aggregate IQ – which had targeted Vote Leave’s Facebook spending – she made no additional comment. Denham

also failed to report, as she had promised to the committee that she would, on the activities of ‘Mainstream Network’ – an anonymous pro-Brexit website that targeted MPs in the period

leading up to the 2019 General Election.

The DCMS Committee was also frustrated by Denham’s refusal to publicly release the details of a court settlement reached with Facebook following the seizure of servers from Cambridge

Analytica’s offices in 2018. Only this week, further calls were made for Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg and other senior Facebook executives to admit when they first knew of Cambridge

Analytica’s data-harvesting activities.

It has been with some astonishment, therefore, that Denham has now been appointed as a consultant to a law firm that had represented Facebook in legal proceedings against the Information

Commissioner’s Office, and with whom she had negotiated. While I make no allegation of wrongdoing, this ‘revolving door’ creates the perception of a possible conflict of interest for any

regulator – weakening the ideal of independence.

Denham aside, the Government’s appointments show that political patronage is being used to its fullest extent in pursuing the Prime Minister’s populist agenda – undermining the separation of

powers between the judiciary, the media, the legislature and the executive.

This adds to a general distrust of British institutions which can, ultimately, only be addressed by a far-reaching constitutional review as part of a coordinated effort to rebuild confidence

in a system that can no longer rely on conventions and ‘good chaps’ in government.

Parliament’s Digital, Culture, Media and Sport CommitteeThis article was filed under2016 EU Referendum, Boris Johnson, Brexit, Conservative Party, Dominic Cummings, Elections, Michael Gove,

Populism, Tech, Data and Algorithms, UK Politics, Vote Leave

Byline Times is brought to you by a dedicated team of journalists and contributors – producing independent, fearless, investigative and thought-provoking journalism not found in the

established media. We are regulated by Impress.

To find the nearest newsagent stocking this month’s edition, search here.

AboutContactSubscriptions

Complaints

Byline TimesByline InvestigatesByline FestivalByline TVByline SupplementByline BooksByline AudioBylines Network

Byline Media Holdings Ltd, Byline Times & Yes We Work Ltd