Introducing the Symposium on AI and Human Rights
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN

Play all audios:

The use of AI is advancing at almost incomprehensible speeds, driving decision making that has broad impacts on society, and with the potential to dramatically impact human rights. Indeed,
AI has the potential to affect nearly every recognized human right, including the rights to freedom of expression, thought, assembly, association and movement; the right to privacy and data
protection; the rights to health, education, work and an adequate standard of living; and non-discrimination and equality. AI may also give rise to the need to instantiate new forms of
rights, such as the right to a human decision.
The human rights abuses that can occur through the implementation of AI systems include facilitating mass surveillance as well as perpetuating bias in the criminal justice system,
healthcare, education, the job market, access to housing, and access to banking, thereby exacerbating discrimination against already marginalized groups. AI is also having a negative impact
on democracies through facilitating the spread of disinformation, the creation of deep-fakes and synthetic media to sow chaos and confusion, and the removal of content documenting human
rights abuses. At the same time, AI has the potential to benefit human rights, from facilitating advances in healthcare to tracking supply chain compliance.
Both governments and corporations have a duty to respect human rights. The international human rights regime is an ecosystem of established laws, frameworks, and institutions at the
international, regional, and domestic levels within which individuals can seek respect for their human rights as well as remedies for human rights violations. Although government and
industry leaders often affirm the centrality of human rights in the development and deployment of “responsible” AI systems, all too often this takes the form of general principles or
statements that are either difficult to implement in practice or neglect to consider the full range of potential use cases. As advances in AI accelerate, human rights need to be integrated
into every level of AI governance regimes.
In February 2024, the Promise Institute for Human Rights at UCLA School of Law convened a symposium on Human Rights and Artificial Intelligence, bringing together leading experts to examine
some of the critical questions arising from the rapid expansion of AI and the lagging governance models. The purpose of this symposium – a collaboration between the Promise Institute and
Just Security – is to share some of the insights captured by our speakers with a broader audience, and to elevate some of the most pressing questions about the relationship between AI and
human rights.
New articles in the series will run each week, tying together the following themes:
Taken together, this symposium provides a rich picture of how AI can be used both to uphold and violate human rights. Widespread AI use is inevitable – policymakers must move quickly to
ensure fundamental rights and freedoms are protected around the world.
Jess Peake is the Director of the International and Comparative Law Program at UCLA School of Law.
DON'T MISS A THING. Stay up to date with Just Security curated newsletters:
Just Security provides expert analysis and informational resources on the issues that matter most—without paywalls, subscriptions, or ads. Just Security is an editorially independent,
non-partisan, daily digital law and policy journal housed in the Reiss Center on Law and Security at the New York University School of Law. Support Just Security in shaping a more informed,
just, and secure world by making a tax-deductible donation of any size through the NYU giving page, or becoming a sustaining supporter.