News Reader.info

The book in question, “American Illustration 4,” a lavishly produced four-color anthology of contemporary approaches to the medium, sets an enviably high standard for the quality of its

reproduction and printing. That, and a limited press run, accounts for its imposing price. Illustration is a funny field. Essentially it uses Fine Art techniques in the service of a

pre-existing printed text, whether ad, book, periodical or promotional piece. This book defines it as variations on the representational--expressionistic, surrealistic, cartoonlike,

theatrical, posterlike, in a staggering display of technical virtuosity in every imaginable traditional medium--gouache, airbrush, crayon, shading films, acrylic, pastel, pencil, ink,

watercolor, scratch board, tempera, collage. You name it. Some examples stand out. Guy Billout’s mesmerizing visual puns, people in predicaments, set in precise, detailed, and appropriate

vacant vistas. Gene Grief’s versions of Herbert Matter on LSD. Walter Bernard and Milton Glaser’s wry, hyperrealistic painting of Karl Marx lighting a cigar with a dollar bill. But,

gradually, doubt enters in. The book (which tends to slide off your knees and onto the floor unless you remain alert) begins to feel heavy. Why? Perhaps it’s the realization that most of

what you’re looking at, you’ve seen before, in its original incarnation. Everything reworks the familiar; Jim Buckels evokes Grant Wood and the Emerald City of Oz; Robert Giusti merges

Leonardo (including the cracks of age on the surface of the painting) with the Time cover look. Elwood H. Smith clones George Herriman, the legendary ‘40s cartoonist. Steve Carver apes

Thomas Hart Benton. Paul Rogers performs a witty rip-off of Soviet constructivism. And so on. The editor, Edward Booth-Clibborn, in his one-page introduction asks the question, “What makes

for originality? And what price does it exact?” Exactly. This retro mood pervades the collection, prompting an additional thought. American commercial illustration used to be one of the very

few popular visual forms which set the standards and created the illusions to which we then aspired. So how come no examples from TV? Film? Computer graphics? How do you define _

illustration? _ Well, OK, there’s one image made on a Macintosh, and five scant examples devoted to animation. But, hey, how about David Byrne’s visual concepts for MTV? Or even Bruce

McColl’s bravura concept renderings for film? Answer: The book, like the field itself, is largely an exercise in parochial nostalgia. This represents the conservative taste of the jurors,

who in turn may merely reflect our present preference for past forms. In fact, the most contemporary thing about this selection is what it tells us about our current preoccupations. Anxiety,

dread and anomie are the darker themes which thread through the more predictable metaphors, visual puns and lyric moods of today, even while clothed in the formal expression of a more

optimistic era. Despite these caveats, “American Illustration 4” is certainly a feast for the eyes and a useful and necessary compendium for the serious student and professional. Who could

ask for more than that? MORE TO READ