Opposing viewpoints on the 'israel lobby'
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN

Play all audios:

Re “Who’s afraid of the ‘Israel Lobby’?” Current, March 26 Nicholas Goldberg summarizes the arguments that the report on the “Israel Lobby” made against supporting Israel (arguments mostly
identified with historical anti-Semitism) and, while mentioning some opposing points of view, ignores the most important reason: An ever-increasing number of the American people support
Israel as compared to the Muslim world. We share the same values. Of all of the United States’ allies, Israel is the only one that can and will fight its own battles and not call on the
American military to die for them. The fact that former Ku Klux Klansman David Duke is in agreement with the report says a great deal. JERRY FREEDMAN _Los Angeles_ * Goldberg asks us to
judge the American Israel Public Affairs Committee for ourselves and to consider just how pernicious the pro-Israel lobby is. To test AIPAC’s strength, a candidate who publicly demands that
Israel sign the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, stop building its wall, withdraw unconditionally from all lands occupied during the 1967 war and allow a democratic Palestinian state to be
formed immediately should run for office. Would either the Republican or Democratic parties run such a candidate? No. If either party made that mistake, the loose confederation of
organizations to which Goldberg alluded would contribute funds to defeat such a candidate. The likelihood of this scenario happening is zilch. I consider AIPAC’s impact pernicious because it
crushes politically anyone who publicly challenges Israel. ARCH MILLER _Arcadia_ * Historically, Jews, in order to survive, have kept a low profile, and I would think Goldberg is well aware
of that. Goldberg needlessly reiterates professors Stephen Walt’s and John Mearsheimer’s statements. Those of us who are concerned and follow events are quite aware of the statements and
don’t need Goldberg’s advice as to how to judge. The truth is simple: The U.S. needs Israel as a balance of power and foothold in the Middle East, and American Jews need Israel to protect
the survival and identity of Jews. Perhaps Goldberg can use half a page to address these issues. MAYER GERSON _Northridge_ * If, as professors Jeffrey Herf and Andrei Markovits note, Jewish
Americans have the right “to express their views without being charged with placing the interests of Israel ahead of those of the United States,” why don’t non-Jewish Americans have the
right to criticize the Israeli lobby without being called anti-Semites? PAUL CIOTTI _Los Angeles_ MORE TO READ