Subnanometer high-entropy alloy nanowires enable remarkable hydrogen oxidation catalysis
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN

Play all audios:

ABSTRACT High-entropy alloys (HEAs) with unique physicochemical properties have attracted tremendous attention in many fields, yet the precise control on dimension and morphology at atomic
level remains formidable challenges. Herein, we synthesize unique PtRuNiCoFeMo HEA subnanometer nanowires (SNWs) for alkaline hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR). The mass and specific
activities of HEA SNWs/C reach 6.75 A mgPt+Ru−1 and 8.96 mA cm−2, respectively, which are 2.8/2.6, 4.1/2.4, and 19.8/18.7 times higher than those of HEA NPs/C, commercial PtRu/C and Pt/C,
respectively. It can even display enhanced resistance to CO poisoning during HOR in the presence of 1000 ppm CO. Density functional theory calculations reveal that the strong interactions
between different metal sites in HEA SNWs can greatly regulate the binding strength of proton and hydroxyl, and therefore enhances the HOR activity. This work not only provides a viable
synthetic route for the fabrication of Pt-based HEA subnano/nano materials, but also promotes the fundamental researches on catalysis and beyond. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS
SINGLE-ATOM MO-TAILORED HIGH-ENTROPY-ALLOY ULTRATHIN NANOSHEETS WITH INTRINSIC TENSILE STRAIN ENHANCE ELECTROCATALYSIS Article Open access 13 March 2024 GAS-BALANCING ADSORPTION STRATEGY
TOWARDS NOBLE-METAL-BASED NANOWIRE ELECTROCATALYSTS Article 03 June 2024 TURING STRUCTURING WITH MULTIPLE NANOTWINS TO ENGINEER EFFICIENT AND STABLE CATALYSTS FOR HYDROGEN EVOLUTION REACTION
Article Open access 04 September 2023 INTRODUCTION Hydrogen fuel cell is considered as one of the most promising energy conversion devices due to its high energy efficiency and
pollution-free feature1,2,3,4,5. Over the past decades, great efforts have been devoted to developing catalysts for hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR) for enhancing the energy conversion
efficiency of the hydrogen fuel cell6,7. The ideal catalysts for HOR should simultaneously fulfill the features of high activity, high durability as well as low cost. As the state-of-the-art
catalyst, PtRu-based alloys have been widely used for HOR in recent years8,9. Despite great progress has been achieved, PtRu-based catalysts still suffer from the drawbacks, including
high-cost, poor stability, and low resistance to CO-poisoning. It is thus highly desired to develop highly efficient catalysts for HOR under operating conditions. Recently, high-entropy
alloys (HEAs) have attracted increasing attention in diverse fields due to their inherent properties, including high thermal stability, strong mechanical strength, excellent corrosion
resistance, and fine trade-off effect on performance10,11,12. As promising catalysts in heterogeneous catalysis, HEAs generally consist of five or more metals, which display the
structure-dependent synergistic effects and enhanced catalytic performance in terms of activity and durability13,14. Moreover, since the HEAs can largely decrease the usage of noble metals
and thus reduce the cost of catalyst15, they have been attracted increasing research interests. For instance, Li et al.16 reported a small HEAs Pt18Ni26Fe15Co14Cu27 nanoparticles (NPs) with
a mean size of ~3.4 nm as an efficient catalyst for alkaline methanol oxidation reaction, on which the synergistic effects facilitate the site-to-site electron transfer during both reduction
and oxidation processes. Cui et al.17 demonstrated that the synergistic effects between different metals in CrMnFeCoNi HEA sulfide can regulate the electronic states and thus enhances the
oxygen evolution reaction activity. Despite the great potentials of HEAs, the controlled synthesis of PtRu-based HEAs with tailored morphologies and sizes still remains great challenges,
which severely impedes their applications. To this end, it is highly desirable to develop facile strategies for fabricating PtRu-based HEAs. Herein, we fabricated PtRuNiCoFeMo HEA
subnanometer nanowires (SNWs) as highly active and durable catalyst for HOR. In particular, the mass activity of HEA SNWs for HOR is 4.1 and 19.8 times higher than that of commercial PtRu/C
and Pt/C, respectively. Moreover, no obvious decay of HOR performance was observed after 2000 cycles in the accelerated durability test (ADT), suggesting the promising stability of HEA SNWs
for HOR. Additionally, HEA SNWs can even display superior resistance to CO poisoning comparing to commercial PtRu/C and Pt/C in the presence of 1000 ppm CO. Density functional theory (DFT)
calculations confirm that the strong interactions between different metals in HEA SNWs can regulate the electronic structures of different metals and thus enhance the HOR activity. In
particular, Co and Ni sites maintain the highly stable valence states due to the pinning effect by nearby Fe and Mo sites, and the Pt and Ru sites modulate the overall electroactivity for
superior HOR performance. This work may not only provide a facile protocol for the controllable synthesis of HEA SNWs, but also promote the fundamental researches on HEAs for catalysis and
beyond. RESULTS MATERIAL SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION For the synthesis of HEA SNWs, we adopted platinum (II) acetylacetonate (Pt(acac)2), ruthenium (III) acetylacetonate (Ru(acac)3),
nickel (II) acetylacetonate (Ni(acac)2), cobalt (III) acetylacetonate (Co(acac)3), iron (III) acetylacetonate (Fe(acac)3), and molybdenum hexacarbonyl (Mo(CO)6) as the metal precursors,
oleylamine (OAm) as the solvent, stearyl trimethyl ammoium bromide (STAB) as the structure-directing agent, and glucose as the reducing agent, respectively. Transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) and high-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM) images show that the obtained HEA SNWs has a mean diameter of 1.8 ± 0.3 nm (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). The
characteristic peaks in the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern are ascribed to face-centered cubic (_fcc_) structure of Pt (JCPDS No. 04−0802), and the positive shifts of peaks in XRD pattern
imply the formation of alloy (Fig. 1b). On the other hand, the weakening and broadening of peaks in the XRD pattern could be attributed to the lattice distortion in HEA SNWs18,19. A scheme
was thus provided to better understand the structure of HEA SNWs (Fig. 1c). Scanning electron microscope energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) shows that the composition of HEA SNWs
is Pt/Ru/Ni/Co/Fe/Mo = 29.6/9.3/15.2/15.6/12.2/18.1 (Fig. 1d), which is close to that from inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) measurement (Pt/Ru/Ni/Co/Fe/Mo
= 28.5/6.8/18.6/15.2/10.7/20.2 (Supplementary Fig. 2). Moreover, both HAADF-STEM-EDS elemental mappings and line scan analysis show that all the metals are uniformly distributed in the HEA
SNWs (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 3). Furthermore, the aberration-corrected high-resolution STEM (HRSTEM) images show that the obtained HEA SNW has a distorted structure with abundant
atomic steps and defect-rich lattice mismatch (Fig. 1f−h). In addition, a 3D atomic model was provided to depict the structure of HEA SNWs (Fig. 1i), which has vividly revealed the unique
structure of HEA SNWs with plentiful surface atomic steps and numerous facet boundaries. HOR PERFORMANCE OF PTRUNICOFEMO HEA SNWS To evaluate the potential applications of the as-prepared
HEAs, PtRuNiCoFeMo HEA SNWs were used as catalyst for HOR, a significant process for hydrogen fuel cell. Prior to HOR test, HEA SNWs were loaded on Vulcan XC-72R carbon (HEA SNWs/C,
Supplementary Fig. 10a), and home-made HEA NPs (Supplementary Fig. 9) loaded on Vulcan XC-72R C (HEA NPs/C), commercial PtRu/C and Pt/C were selected as the references (Supplementary Fig.
10b−d and Fig. 11). Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) spectrum of HEA SNWs shows that most of the ligands have been removed from the surface of HEA SNWs/C (Supplementary Fig. 12). From the
cyclic voltammograms (CVs) curves of various catalysts obtained in 0.1 M HClO4 solution at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1 (Supplementary Fig. 13), we can see that the presence of Ru significantly
broadens the electrical double-layer capacitor20,21. It is found that the anode current of HEA SNWs/C increases sharply with the potential (Fig. 2a). In particular, HEA SNWs/C exhibits a
high and steady current density with the increased potential, whereas a gradual decay in the current density was observed for HEA NPs/C, suggesting that HEA SNWs/C can be serve as a highly
efficient catalyst for HOR22. Moreover, the HEA SNWs/C for HOR was evaluated in N2-saturated 0.1 M KOH solution to measure the anodic current. As shown in Fig. 2a (yellow line), the current
density is ~0 when the potential is over 0.1 V, and the weak current density at 0–0.1 V is ascribed to Ru oxidation, which confirms the occurrence of HOR in H2-saturated 0.1 M KOH solution.
The Koutecky–Levich plot was then collected to verify the electron transport process (Supplementary Fig. 14). It is found that the slopes for HEA NPs/C, PtRu/C, and Pt/C are 10.78, 11.36,
16.95 mA cmdisk−2 rpm1/2, respectively. In contrast, the slope for HEA SNWs/C is 14.06 mA cmdisk−2 rpm1/2, which is close to the theoretical value (15.06 mA cmdisk−2 rpm1/2), further
confirming the H2 mass-transport controlled process (Supplementary Fig. 15)23,24. Figure 2b shows the kinetic currents (_J_k) as a logarithmic function vs. the potential for HEA SNWs/C, HEA
NPs/C, PtRu/C, and Pt/C. The value of exchange current (_I_0) of HEA NWs/C is 1.26 mA, which is 1.5, 2.4, and 4.5 times to that of HEA NPs/C (0.84 mA), PtRu/C (0.52 mA), and Pt/C (0.28 mA),
respectively. To quantitatively compare the HOR activity of each catalyst, we calculated the mass activity and specific activity normalized with the loading amount of noble metal and
electrochemical surface area (ECSA), respectively. The ECSAs of different catalysts were determined by the CO stripping curves (Supplementary Fig. 16 and Supplementary Table 1). As shown in
Fig. 2c and Supplementary Table 2, the mass activity of HEA SNWs/C for HOR reaches 6.75 A mgPt+Ru−1 at 50 mV vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), which is 2.8, 4.1, and 19.8 times higher
than that of HEA NPs/C (2.37 A mgPt+Ru−1), PtRu/C (1.65 A mgPt+Ru−1) and Pt/C (0.34 A mgPt+Ru−1), respectively. On the other hand, the specific activities of HEA NWs/C, HEA NPs/C, PtRu/C,
and Pt/C are 8.96, 3.47, 3.77, and 0.48 mA cm−2, respectively, indicating the superior HOR activity of HEA SNWs/C to the references (Supplementary Table 2). Moreover, the stability was
evaluated by measuring the HOR activities of different catalysts after 2000 cycles of ADTs (Supplementary Fig. 17). Only 6.2% loss in mass activity was observed after 2000 cycles of ADT for
HEA SNWs/C. In sharp contrast, the HOR activities decrease by 20.6%, 31.5%, and 35.3% for HEA NPs/C, PtRu/C, and Pt/C, respectively, indicating the superior stability of HEA SNWs/C to
commercial PtRu/C and Pt/C (Fig. 2d). Moreover, CO stripping experiments were performed on HEA SNWs/C and Pt/C after 2000 cycles of ADT to further study the stability. It is found that the
ECSA of HEA SNWs/C decreases by 22.3% after 2000 cycles, which is lower than that of Pt/C (30.6%), suggesting the enhanced stability of HEA SNWs/C (Supplementary Fig. 18). Additionally, the
morphologies and compositions of the spent catalysts were investigated. Compared to the spent PtRu/C and Pt/C catalysts, which aggregate after ADT (Supplementary Fig. 19), the morphology and
composition of the spent HEA SNWs/C are maintained, indicating that HEA SNWs can serve as the stable catalyst for HOR (Supplementary Fig. 20). Considering the resistance to CO poisoning of
catalyst is a key factor for hydrogen fuel cell25,26,27, the HOR performance of HEA SNWs/C and other references were investigated in the presence of 1000 ppm CO. It is noted that the
limiting current density of HEA SNWs/C decreases only by 5.4% at 100 mV vs. RHE, which is smaller than those of HEA NPs/C (6.2%), PtRu/C (21.3%) and Pt/C (22.7%), suggesting the
significantly enhanced resistance to CO poisoning of HEA SNWs/C (Supplementary Fig. 21). Moreover, the stability of catalyst was further evaluated using the chronoamperometry method at 100
mV vs. RHE in the presence of 1000 ppm CO. The HOR activity decreases by 26.4% after 2000 s (Fig. 2e). In contrast, the HOR activities of HEA NPs/C and PtRu/C decrease by 61.5% and 82.9%,
respectively, and the commercial Pt/C completely deactivates after 1130 s. The aforementioned results imply that HEA SNWs/C can serve as a highly active and stable catalyst for alkaline HOR
(Supplementary Table 3). MECHANISM INVESTIGATION To reveal the mechanism for the enhanced HOR performance over HEA SNWs/C, the surface properties of catalyst was studied by X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurement. It is noted that all the metal elements in HEA SNWs are mixed with metal state and oxidation state. Compared to HEA NPs/C, the peak in the Pt0 4
_f_ XPS spectrum of HEA SNWs/C positively shifts by 0.13 eV (Fig. 3a), while the peak in the Ru0 3_p_ XPS spectrum negatively shifts by 0.36 eV (Fig. 3b), indicating that electrons might
transfer from Pt to Ru in HEA SNWs. On the other hand, the Ni0 2_p_, Co0 2_p_, Fe0 2_p_ and Mo4+ 3_d_ XPS spectra of HEA SNWs positively shift by 0.26, 0.17, 0.93 and 0.25 eV, respectively,
in comparison to HEA NPs (Supplementary Fig. 22). Considering that only Ru0 3_p_ XPS spectrum negatively shifts by 0.36 eV, we might conclude that the positive shifts of Ni0 2_p_, Co0 2_p_,
Fe0 2_p_, and Mo4+ 3_d_ XPS spectra were attributed to the electron transfer from Ni, Co, Fe and Mo to Ru in HEA SNWs. To further study the influence of electron transfer on the binding
strength of reactants and intermediates during HOR, we compared the _d_-band center of various catalysts. Compared to values of HEA NPs/C (−3.732 eV), PtRu/C (−3.631 eV) and Pt/C (−3.548
eV), the _d_-band center of HEA SNWs/C shifts upwards to −3.835 eV (Fig. 3c, d), which thereby weakens the adsorption of H but facilitate the adsorption of OH intermediate28,29. Considering
the significant effect of Ru on HOR that can facilitate the adsorption of OH* species30,31, we evaluated the HOR performance over HEA SNWs and PtNiCoFeMo HEA SNWs/C. The mass activity of HEA
SNWs/C is 11.8 times higher than that of PtNiCoFeMo HEA SNWs/C (Supplementary Fig. 23a, b). Moreover, compared to the PtNiCoFeMo HEA SNWs/C, HEA SNWs/C displays significantly improved
resistance to CO poisoning (Supplementary Fig. 23c). In particular, the HOR activity in the presence of 1000 ppm CO decreases by 26.4% after 2000 s when HEA SNWs/C was used as catalyst,
which is much smaller than that of PtNiCoFeMo HEA SNWs/C (85.2%), confirming the significance of Ru on HOR. Additionally, the position of the CO stripping peak of HEA SNWs/C shifts
positively compared with Pt/C, which further suggests that the presence of Ru significantly improves the resistance to CO poisoning (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 16). The aforementioned
results imply that the strong electronic interaction between different elements in HEA SNWs can regulate the adsorption abilities of H and OH species, and then enhances the alkaline HOR
activity (Fig. 3e). DFT calculations were conducted to further investigate the mechanism for the enhanced HOR performance. It is noted that both Ni and Ru sites show subtle distortions while
the overall HEA SNWs remain stable, which confirms the stability of HEA SNWs/C (Fig. 4a, b). With respect to the electronic structures, the strong coupling between the bonding and
anti-bonding orbitals on the HEA surfaces delivers a high HOR activity with efficient site-to-site electron transfer between different metal sites. Moreover, the detailed electronic
structures of HEA SNWs are also demonstrated by the projected partial density of states (PDOSs) (Fig. 4c)32. Notably, the evident overlaps between _d_-orbitals are observed, indicating the
strong bonding between different metals. In particular, we notice the evident sharp Ni 3_d_ orbitals locate near −1.30 eV, which is a key indicator for the strong adsorptions of H* and OH*.
Meanwhile, Co 3_d_ orbitals show a similar position with the Ni 3_d_ orbitals, which may further facilitate the electron transfer. Similar phenomena were observed for Fe 3_d_ and Mo 4_d_
orbitals, and the overlap of _d_ orbital might not only enhance the electron transfer, but also impose the pinning effect on the 3_d_ orbitals of Ni and Co sites for a robust
electroactivity. On the other hand, Pt 5_d_ orbital locates at the furthest position to Fermi level, suggesting that Ru plays as the electron reservoir to balance the valence state of HEA
NWs during electrocatalysis. Moreover, the Ru 4_d_ ranges from −6.0 to +4.0 eV, which enables the flexible electronic modulations and accelerates the site-to-site electron transfer on the
HEA surfaces. Furthermore, the site-dependent electronic structure of each element in HEA SNWs has been demonstrated. As shown in Fig. 4d, the Pt-5_d_ center gradually approaches to the
Fermi level from the bulk (cyan color) to the surface of HEA SNWs (green color), indicating that the H2 adsorption becomes much stronger on the surface than on the bulk of HEA SNWs. It is
noted that the overall Pt-5_d_ orbital is further away from the Fermi level compared to the pure Pt metal (black color), indicating that HEA SNWs has an appropriate level of Pt-5_d_ band for
H2 adsorption and therefore exhibits enhanced HOR activity. The Ni-3_d_ orbital of pure Ni metal (black color) is much broader than those of HEA SNWs (Fig. 4e), suggesting that the
localized electron density of Ni-3_d_ orbital in HEA SNWs is much higher than that of pure Ni metal, which can bring more possibilities in charge transfer and bonding chances with OH*.
Besides, from the bulk to the surface, the gradual absence of the eg-t2g band splitting of Co 3_d_ orbitals leads to the efficient intra-orbital eg-t2g electron transfer rather than transfer
between _d_-_d_ orbitals, which further promotes the site-to-site electron transfer from catalysts to adsorbates (Fig. 4f). It is also noted that the electronic structure of Co in HEA SNWs
are similar from the bulk to the surface. Such a robust electronic structure is attributed to the double pinning effect by the shielding effect from neighboring Fe/Mo and Ru orbitals. For Fe
sites, the eg-t2g band splitting for 3_d_ orbitals decreases from 3.33 to 2.79 eV from the bulk site to the surface sites, supporting a more efficient electron transfer towards OH* (Fig.
4g). Similar decreases on the eg-t2g band splitting were observed for Mo-4_d_ orbitals, and the energy barrier significantly reduces from 3.39 to 2.61 eV from the bulk to the surface (Fig.
4h). The HEA SNWs has relaxed the forbidden rule of intra-orbital eg-t2g electron transfer, which annihilates the gap between the eg-t2g splitting of the Fe-3_d_ bands and Mo-4_d_ bands. The
smaller gap between the band further lowers the barrier for the site-to-site electron transfer on the surface. The evolutions of electronic structures in Fe and Mo sites show a similar
trend towards the decrease of the eg-t2g splitting. This not only improves the site-to-site electron transfer on the surface, but also strengthens the protection effect of valence states for
Ni and Co sites. In addition, we have performed the further detailed characterizations of electronic structures and confirmed the improved electroactivity of HEA surface, which guarantees
the efficient HOR (Supplementary Fig. 24). In addition, we compared the hydrogen binding energy (HBE) and the oxhydryl binding energy (OHBE) of HEA SNWs/C33,34,35. Compared with the strong
bindings of H* on Pt (111) and PtRu (111), the binding strength of H* on HEA SNWs/C has been significantly weakened to an appropriate level near the 0 eV (an ideal value for H* binding),
leading to the improved HOR activity over HEA SNWs/C (Fig. 4i). For OHBE, despite the OH* binding strength display a trend of Pt < Co < Fe < Ni < Mo < Ru, the binding energy
of OH* on Ru is nearly −0.6 eV, suggesting that the moderate adsorption of OH* on HEA SNWs/C (Fig. 4j). It has been well known that the adsorbed OH* plays a vital role to remove the adsorbed
proton in the form of H2O, and therefore significantly enhances the alkaline HOR activity (Fig. 4j and Supplementary Fig. 25)36,37,38. On the other hand, the overall reaction on HEA is
exothermic with an energy release of 0.22 eV, indicating the rapid desorption of H2O. In sharp contrast, the overall reactions on Pt and PtRu are endothermic with energies of 0.57 and 0.27
eV, respectively (Fig. 4k). Note that the energy barrier for H2O formation on HEA surface is as low as 0.08 eV, which is much lower than that of Pt and PtRu, further confirming the superior
HOR activity of HEA to Pt and PtRu (Fig. 4k). DISCUSSION In summary, we have demonstrated a successful synthesis of PtRuNiCoFeMo HEA SNWs with abundant surface atomic steps and facet
boundaries for efficient HOR. Compared with the state-of-the-art PtRu/C and Pt/C catalysts, HEA SNWs/C exhibits advantages, including high activity, enhanced stability, and promising
resistance to CO poisoning, being a promising catalyst for alkaline HOR. In particular, the mass activity and specific activity of HEA SNWs reach 6.75 A mgPt+Ru−1 and 8.96 mA cm−2, which are
2.8/2.6, 4.1/2.4, and 19.8/18.7 times higher than those of HEA NP/C, commercial PtRu/C and Pt/C, respectively. DFT calculations reveal that the strong synergy significantly varies the
electronic properties of different elements in HEA SNWs, which further regulates the HBE and OHBE. This work not only provides a viable synthetic route for the fabrication of Pt-based HEA
subnano/nano materials, but also promotes the fundamental researches on catalysis and beyond. METHODS CHEMICALS Pt(acac)2 (97%), Ni(acac)2 (95%), Co(acac)3 (98%), Fe(acac)3 (98%), and STAB
(98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Ru(acac)3 (97%) was supplied by Alfa Aesar. Mo(CO)6 (98%) was purchased from Strem Chemicals Inc. Glucose (C6H12O6, analytical reagent), potassium
hydrate (KOH, analytical reagent), ethanol (C2H6O, analytical reagent, ≥99.7%), cyclohexane (C6H12, analytical reagent, ≥99.7%) and isopropanol (C3H8O, analytical reagent, ≥99.7%) were
purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. OAm was supplied by Aladdin. HClO4 (analytical reagent, 70–72%) was purchased from Tianjin Zhengcheng Chemical Products Co. Ltd. All
chemical reagents were used as received without further purification. All aqueous solutions were prepared using deionized water with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm−1. MATERIALS SYNTHESIS In a
typical synthesis of PtRuNiCoFeMo HEA SNWs, 9.8 mg Pt(acac)2, 5.0 mg Ru(acac)3, 3.8 mg Ni(acac)2, 7.0 mg Co(acac)3, 7.0 mg Fe(acac)3, 10 mg Mo(CO)6, 60 mg glucose, and 39.3 mg STAB were
dissolved in 5 mL OAm, followed by ultrasonication for 2 h. The mixture was then heated in an oil bath at 210 °C for 5 h. The cooled product was collected by centrifugation and washed three
times with a cyclohexane/ethanol (v/v = 1:9) mixture. For the synthesis of PtRuNiCoFeMo HEA NPs, all of the conditions are similar to those of HEA SNWs except for the additions of STAB and
glucose. CHARACTERIZATIONS XRD measurement was conducted on a SmartLab-SE powder diffractometer equipped with a Cu radiation source (_λ_ = 0.15406 nm). SEM-EDS was observed through ZEISS
Sigma 300 field emission scanning electron microscope. TEM was operated on JEM-1400 TEM at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV. HRTEM was conducted on a FEI Tecnai F30 TEM at an accelerating
voltage of 300 kV. HAADF-STEM-EDS was conducted on a FEI Titan Cubed Themis G2300. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra were collected by XPS (Thermo Scientific, ESCALAB 250 XI). The
carbon peak at 284.6 eV was used as the reference to correct for charging effects. The concentrations of the catalysts were determined by ICP-OES (ICAP 7000, ThermoFisher, USA). FT-IR was
performed with KBr in the range of 4000–400 cm−1 (Nicolet iS50). ELECTROCHEMICAL MEASUREMENTS The electrocatalytic properties toward HOR were evaluated using a RDE (Pine, diameter of 5 mm)
with CHI 760E Electrochemical Workstation. A SCE and a graphite rod were used as the reference electrode and counter electrode, respectively. HOR measurements were performed in 0.1 M KOH
solutions purged with high-purity H2. The sweep rate was 5 mV s−1 to collected the HOR polarization curves. The accelerated durability tests were carried out in 0.1 M KOH between −0.1 V and
0.4 V vs. RHE at a scan rate of 500 mV s−1 for 2000 cycles. The CO antipoisoning tests were carried out in 0.1 M KOH purged with saturated 1000 ppm CO/H2, and the long-range stability test
voltage was at 100 mV vs. RHE. The kinetic current (_J_k) was calculated using the Koutecky–Levich equation. $$\frac{1}{J}=\frac{1}{J_{{{{{\mathrm{k}}}}}}}+\frac{1}{J_{{{{{\mathrm{d}}}}}}}$$
(1) where _J_ is measured current and _J_d is diffusion-limited current, which can be fitted to the Butler–Volmer equation and Levich equation:
$$J_{{{{{\mathrm{k}}}}}}={{J}}_{{{{{\mathrm{0}}}}}}\left({e}^{\frac{\alpha_{{{{{\mathrm{a}}}}}}{{{{{\rm{F}}}}}}{{{{{\rm{\eta
}}}}}}}{{{{{{\rm{RT}}}}}}}}-{e}^{-\frac{\alpha_{{{{{\mathrm{c}}}}}}{{{{{\rm{F}}}}}}{{{{{\rm{\eta }}}}}}}{{{{{{\rm{RT}}}}}}}}\right)$$ (2)
$$J_{{{{{\mathrm{d}}}}}}=0{{{{{\rm{.62nF}}}}}}{D}^{3/2}{\nu }^{-1/6}C_0{\omega }^{1/2}={{BC}}_0{\omega }^{1/2}$$ (3) in which _α_a and _α_c are the anodic and cathodic transfer coefficients
(_α_a + _α_c = 1), _F_ is the Faraday constant, _η_ is the overpotential, _R_ is the universal gas constant, _T_ is the Kelvin temperature, _n_ is the electrons number, _D_ is the diffusion
coefficient, _ν_ is the viscosity coefficient, _C_0 is the solubility, _ω_ is the rotating speed, and _B_ is the Levich constant, respectively. For the CO stripping measurement, CO gas was
bubbled into 0.1 M HClO4 solution for 30 min. The electrode was quickly moved to a fresh 0.1 M HClO4 solution and recorded the two cycles to calculate CO stripping peak. The electrochemical
surface area of the noble metals was obtained using Eqs. (4) and (5). $${Q}_{{{{{{\rm{co}}}}}}-{{{{{\rm{adsorption}}}}}}}(C)=\frac{\int
{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{dE}}}}}}({{{{{\rm{mA}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{V}}}}}})}{\nu ({{{{{\rm{mV}}}}}}/{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}})}$$ (4)
$${{{{{\rm{ECSA}}}}}}\left(\frac{{m}^{2}}{g}\right)=\left[\frac{{Q}_{{{{{{\rm{co}}}}}}-{{{{{\rm{adsorption}}}}}}}(C)}{420(\mu
\frac{C}{{{{{{{\rm{cm}}}}}}}^{2}}){M}_{{{{{{\rm{Pt}}}}}}/({{{{{\rm{Pt}}}}}}+{{{{{\rm{Ru}}}}}})}({{{{{\rm{mg}}}}}})}\right]{10}^{5}$$ (5) CALCULATION SETUP To investigate the electronic
structures, we have utilized DFT calculations within CASTEP packages in this work39. To achieve accurate descriptions of the exchange-correlation energy, we applied the generalized gradient
approximation (GGA) and Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) in all the calculations40,41,42. Meanwhile, we have set the cutoff energy of the plane-wave basis to be 380 eV based on the ultrafine
quality. Meanwhile, we choose the ultrasoft pseudopotentials with the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shannon (BFGS) algorithm. For the k-point settings, we have applied the coarse quality for the
energy minimizations43. Based on the experimental results, the HEA structure has been cleaved from the (111) surface of _fcc_ Pt with five-layered thickness. We choose a 4 × 5 × 1 unit cell
for the HEA structure with 100 atoms. The element ratios are consistent with the ICP-OES results of experiments, which show the component of 28.5/6.8/18.6/15.2/10.7/20.2 for
Pt/Ru/Ni/Fe/Co/Mo. In this work, the slab model is constructed based on the random arrangements coding methods. We compare this slab model with other slab models based on slightly different
atomic arrangements of the elements. After comparison, we select the model with the lowest formation energies as the most thermodynamically stable model in this work. Different binding
positions are selected for HEA, Pt (111) and Pt (111) surface. For the HEA surfaces, we select the element-top sites for the proton adsorption. For Pt (111) surfaces, we select three
different adsorption sites, including Pt-top, bridge and hollow sites. For the PtRu (111) surface, we select five different adsorption sites, including Pt-top, Ru-top, PtRu-bridge, Pt2Ru
(Pt-Pt-Ru) hollow and PtRu2 (Pt-Ru-Ru) hollow sites. In PtRu (111) surface, PtRu2 hollow sites represent the hollow sites that constructed by one Pt and two Ru sites and the Pt2Ru hollow
sites represent the hollow sites constructed by two Pt and one Ru sites. To guarantee relaxations, we introduce 20 Å vacuum space in the z-axis. For all the geometry optimizations, we have
set the following criteria for the convergence: Hellmann-Feynman forces on the atom should not exceed 0.001 eV Å−1, the total energy difference should be less than 5 × 10−5 eV atom−1, and
the inter-ionic displacement should not exceed 0.005 Å. For the reactions of HOR, the calculations of energetic trend are based on the following reactions (Eqs. 6–8)36,37,38.
$${{{{{\rm{Tafel}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{step}}}}}}:\,{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}_{2}+2{{{{{{\rm{OH}}}}}}}^{-}\,=2{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}^{\ast }+2{{{{{{\rm{OH}}}}}}}^{\ast }+2{{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{-}$$ (6)
$${{{{{\rm{Volmer}}}}}}\,{{{{{\rm{step}}}}}}:2{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}^{\ast }+2{{{{{{\rm{OH}}}}}}}^{\ast
}+2{{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{-}\,={{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}_{2}{{{{{\rm{O}}}}}}+{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}^{\ast }+{{{{{{\rm{OH}}}}}}}^{\ast }+{{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{-}$$ (7)
$${{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}_{2}{{{{{\rm{O}}}}}}+{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}^{\ast }+{{{{{{\rm{OH}}}}}}}^{\ast }+{{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{-}\,=2{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}_{2}{{{{{\rm{O}}}}}}+2{{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}}}^{-}$$ (8)
DATA AVAILABILITY The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper. CHANGE HISTORY * _ 01
DECEMBER 2021 A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27395-1 _ REFERENCES * Gasteiger, H. A. & Marković, N. M. Just a dream or future reality?
_Science_ 324, 48–49 (2009). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Zhang, H. & Shen, P. K. Advances in the high performance polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cells. _Chem.
Soc. Rev._ 41, 2382–2394 (2012). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Cong, Y. Y., Yi, B. L. & Song, Y. J. Hydrogen oxidation reaction in alkaline media: from mechanism to recent
electrocatalysts. _Nano Energy_ 44, 288–303 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar * Long, C. et al. Tuning the electronic structure of PtRu bimetallic nanoparticles for promoting the
hydrogen oxidation reaction in alkaline media. _Inorg. Chem. Front._ 6, 2900–2905 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Qin, B. et al. A novel IrNi@PdIr/C core–shell electrocatalyst with
enhanced activity and durability for the hydrogen oxidation reaction in alkaline anion exchange membrane fuel cells. _Nanoscale_ 10, 4872–4881 (2018). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar *
Strmcnik, D. et al. Improving the hydrogen oxidation reaction rate by promotion of hydroxyl adsorption. _Nat. Chem._ 5, 300–306 (2013). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Durst, J. et
al. New insights into the electrochemical hydrogen oxidation and evolution reaction mechanism. _Energ. Environ. Sci._ 7, 2255–2260 (2014). Article CAS Google Scholar * Long, C. et al.
Tuning the electronic structure of PtRu bimetallic nanoparticles for promoting the hydrogen oxidation reaction in alkaline media. _Inorg. Chem. Front._ 6, 2900–2905 (2019). Article CAS
Google Scholar * Li, Q. et al. The comparability of Pt to Pt-Ru in catalyzing the hydrogen oxidation reaction for alkaline polymer electrolyte fuel cells operated at 80 °C. _Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed._ 58, 1442–1446 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * George, E. P., Raabe, D. & Ritchie, R. O. High-entropy alloys. _Nat. Rev. Mater._ 4, 515–534 (2019). Article ADS CAS
Google Scholar * Tsai, M. H. & Yeh, J. W. High-entropy alloys: a critical review. _Mater. Res. Lett._ 2, 107–123 (2014). Article Google Scholar * Wang, X. et al. Continuous synthesis
of hollow high-entropy nanoparticles for energy and catalysis applications. _Adv. Mater._ 32, 2002853 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Shi, P. et al. Enhanced strength-ductility
synergy in ultrafine-grained eutectic high-entropy alloys by inheriting microstructural lamellae. _Nat. Commun._ 10, 489 (2019). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar *
Alfred, L. Maximize mixing in highly polyelemental solid solution alloy nanoparticles. _Matter_ 4, 2100–2101 (2021). Article Google Scholar * Wu, Z. P. et al. Alloying-realloying enabled
high durability for Pt-Pd-3d-transition metal nanoparticle fuel cell catalysts. _Nat. Commun._ 12, 859 (2021). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Li, H. et al. Fast
site-to-site electron transfer of high-entropy alloy nanocatalyst driving redox electrocatalysis. _Nat. Commun._ 11, 5437 (2020). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
* Cui, M. et al. High-entropy metal sulfide nanoparticles promise high-performance oxygen evolution reaction. _Adv. Energy Mater._ 11, 2002887 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Xin, Y.
et al. High-entropy alloys as a platform for catalysis: progress, challenges, and opportunities. _ACS Catal._ 10, 11280–11306 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Chang, X., Zeng, M.,
Liu, K. & Fu, L. Phase engineering of high-entropy alloys. _Adv. Mater._ 32, 1907226 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Li, J. et al. Experimental proof of the bifunctional
mechanism for the hydrogen oxidation in alkaline media. _Angew. Chem. Int. Ed._ 56, 15594–15598 (2017). Article CAS Google Scholar * Zhang, J. et al. Engineering the near-surface of PtRu3
nanoparticles to improve hydrogen oxidation activity in alkaline electrolyte. _Small_ 17, 2006698 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Zhou, Y. et al. Lattice-confined Ru clusters with
high CO tolerance and activity for the hydrogen oxidation reaction. _Nat. Catal._ 3, 454–462 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Sheng, W., Gasteiger, H. A. & Yang, S. H. Y. Hydrogen
oxidation and evolution reaction kinetics on platinum: acid vs alkaline electrolytes. _J. Electrochem. Soc._ 157, B1529 (2010). Article CAS Google Scholar * Mao, J. et al. Isolated Ni
atoms dispersed on Ru nanosheets: high-performance electrocatalysts toward hydrogen oxidation reaction. _Nano Lett._ 20, 3442–3448 (2020). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Lu, S.
Q. & Zhuang, Z. B. Investigating the influences of the adsorbed species on catalytic activity for hydrogen oxidation reaction in alkaline electrolyte. _J. Am. Chem. Soc._ 139, 5156–5163
(2017). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Wang, L. K. et al. Suppression of carbon monoxide poisoning in proton exchange membrane fuel cells via gold nanoparticle/titania ultrathin
film heterogeneous catalysts. _ACS Appl. Energy Mater._ 2, 3479–3487 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Sheng, W. C. et al. Correlating hydrogen oxidation and evolution activity on
platinum at different pH with measured hydrogen binding energy. _Nat. Commun._ 6, 5848 (2015). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Pan, Y. et al. Electronic structure and d-band
center control engineering over M-doped CoP (M = Ni, Mn, Fe) hollow polyhedron frames for boosting hydrogen production. _Nano Energy_ 56, 411–419 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar *
Chen, Z. et al. Tailoring the d-band centers enables Co4N nanosheets to be highly active for hydrogen evolution catalysis. _Angew. Chem. Int. Ed._ 57, 5076–5080 (2018). Article ADS CAS
Google Scholar * Wang, Y. et al. Pt-Ru catalyzed hydrogen oxidation in alkaline media: oxophilic effect or electronic effect? _Energ. Environ. Sci._ 8, 177–181 (2015). Article CAS Google
Scholar * Takeguchi, T. et al. Evidence of nonelectrochemical shift reaction on a co-tolerant high-entropy state Pt-Ru anode catalyst for reliable and efficient residential fuel cell
systems. _J. Am. Chem. Soc._ 134, 14508–14512 (2012). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Thomas, A. B. et al. High-Entropy Alloys as a Discovery Platform for Electrocatalysis. _Joule_
3, 834–845 (2019). Article Google Scholar * Qiu, Y. et al. BCC-Phased PdCu alloy as a highly active electrocatalyst for hydrogen oxidation in alkaline electrolytes. _J. Am. Chem. Soc._
140, 16580–16588 (2018). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Wang, G. et al. Unraveling the composition-activity relationship of Pt-Ru binary alloy for hydrogen oxidation reaction in
alkaline media. _J. Power Sources_ 412, 282–286 (2019). Article ADS CAS Google Scholar * Duan, Y. et al. Bimetallic nickel-molybdenum/tungsten nanoalloys for high-efficiency hydrogen
oxidation catalysis in alkaline electrolytes. _Nat. Commun._ 11, 4789 (2020). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Strmcnik, D. et al. Improving the hydrogen
oxidation reaction rate by promotion of hydroxyl adsorption. _Nat. Chem._ 5, 300–306 (2013). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Alia, S. M., Pivovar, B. S. & Yan, Y. Platinum-coated
copper nanowires with high activity for hydrogen oxidation reaction in base. _J. Am. Chem. Soc._ 135, 13473–13478 (2013). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Durst, J. et al. New
insights into the electrochemical hydrogen oxidation and evolution reaction mechanism. _Energy Environ. Sci._ 7, 2255–2260 (2014). Article CAS Google Scholar * Clark, S. J. et al. First
principles methods using castep. _Z. Kristallogr_ 220, 567–570 (2005). Article CAS Google Scholar * Hasnip, P. J. & Pickard, C. J. Electronic energy minimisation with ultrasoft
pseudopotentials. _Comput. Phys. Commun._ 174, 24–29 (2006). Article ADS MathSciNet CAS MATH Google Scholar * Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient
approximation made simple. _Phys. Rev. Lett._ 77, 3865–3868 (1996). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Perdew, J. P. et al. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces - applications of
the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. _Phys. Rev. B_ 46, 6671–6687 (1992). Article ADS CAS Google Scholar * Head, J. D. & Zerner, M. C. A
broyden-fletcher-goldfarb-shanno optimization procedure for molecular geometries. _Chem. Phys. Lett._ 122, 264–270 (1985). Article ADS CAS Google Scholar Download references
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFB1505802), the Ministry of Science and Technology (2017YFA0208200, 2016YFA0204100),
the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22025108 and 51802206), the Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (2021B1515020081), and the start-up
support from Xiamen University. AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * These authors contributed equally: Changhong Zhan, Yong Xu. AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * State Key Laboratory of Physical
Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, 361005, Xiamen, China Changhong Zhan, Lingzheng Bu, Tang Yang, Ying Zhang & Xiaoqing Huang
* Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Materials and Energy Storage Devices, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Energy Materials, School of Materials and Energy, Guangdong
University of Technology, 510006, Guangzhou, China Yong Xu * Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 110016, Shenyang,
China Huaze Zhu & Zhiqing Yang * College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Soochow University, 215123, Suzhou, China Yonggang Feng & Qi Shao * Department of
Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China Bolong Huang Authors * Changhong Zhan View author publications You can
also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yong Xu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Lingzheng Bu View author publications You
can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Huaze Zhu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yonggang Feng View author
publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Tang Yang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ying Zhang View
author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Zhiqing Yang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Bolong
Huang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Qi Shao View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar *
Xiaoqing Huang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS X.H. conceived and supervised the research. X.H., C.Z., and Y.X. designed
the experiments. X.H., C.Z., Y.X., L.B., T.Y., and Q.S. performed data analysis and experiments discussions. H.Z., Z.Y., Y.F., and Y.Z. performed and analyzed the HAADF-STEM and
corresponding EDS characterizations. B.H. performed the DFT simulations. X.H., L.B., C.Z., and Y.X. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence to Lingzheng Bu, Bolong Huang or Xiaoqing Huang. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION PEER REVIEW INFORMATION _Nature Communications_ thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains
neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCE DATA SOURCE DATA RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS
OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or
other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in
the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the
copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Zhan, C., Xu, Y., Bu, L.
_et al._ Subnanometer high-entropy alloy nanowires enable remarkable hydrogen oxidation catalysis. _Nat Commun_ 12, 6261 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26425-2 Download citation
* Received: 22 June 2021 * Accepted: 06 October 2021 * Published: 29 October 2021 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26425-2 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link
with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt
content-sharing initiative