News Reader.info

ABSTRACT Chinese kale (_Brassica oleracea_ var. _alboglabra_) has high nutritional value. This study investigated the contents of glucosinolates, antioxidants (chlorophylls, carotenoids,

vitamin C, and total phenolics), and antioxidant capacity in five organs from six varieties of Chinese kale. The highest concentrations of individual and total glucosinolates were in the

roots and inflorescences, respectively. The highest levels of antioxidants and antioxidant capacity were in inflorescences and leaves. Plant organs played a predominant role in glucosinolate

and antioxidant accumulation. Glucoiberin, glucoraphanin, and glucobrassicin, the main anticarcinogenic glucosinolates, could be enhanced simultaneously because of their high positive

correlations. The relationship between glucosinolates and antioxidant capacity indicated that glucobrassicin might contribute to the total antioxidant capacity. These results provide useful

information related to consumption, breeding of functional varieties, and use of the non-edible organs of Chinese kale. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS COLOR ATTRIBUTES, BETACYANIN,

AND CAROTENOID PROFILES, BIOACTIVE COMPONENTS, AND RADICAL QUENCHING CAPACITY IN SELECTED _AMARANTHUS GANGETICUS_ LEAFY VEGETABLES Article Open access 02 June 2021 NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION,

BIOACTIVE COMPOUNDS AND ANTIOXIDANT POTENTIALITY OF SOME INDIGENOUS VEGETABLES CONSUMED IN BANGLADESH Article Open access 12 November 2024 A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF NUTRITIONAL,

PHYTOCHEMICAL, AND ANTIOXIDANT BENEFITS OF AN UNDERUTILIZED FRUIT _TETRASTIGMA LEUCOSTAPHYLUM_ Article Open access 28 April 2025 INTRODUCTION Chinese kale (_Brassica oleracea_ var.

_alboglabra_) (Brassicaceae) is widely distributed in southern China and Southeast Asia. It is usually grown for its bolting stems, which are consumed. Chinese kale is highly nutritious

because of its health-promoting phytochemicals, including glucosinolates, carotenoids, vitamin C, and phenolic compounds1,2,3. Glucosinolates are sulfur- and nitrogen-containing secondary

metabolites that exist mainly in the Brassicaceae4. They are grouped into aliphatic, aromatic, and indole glucosinolates5,6. Glucosinolates and their degradation products have miscellaneous

biological functions. Isothiocyanates, glucosinolate hydrolysis products, have significant anticarcinogenic activity. Isothiocyanates possess protective effects against different types of

cancer, particularly bladder, colon, and lung cancer7.Carotenoids, efficient quenchers of singlet oxygen, can scavenge free radicals and thus prevent the development of cancer8. Vitamin C

can scavenge superoxide and hydroxyl radicals and act as a chain-breaking antioxidant in lipid peroxidation9,10. Phenolics have biological effects, such as inhibition of low-density

lipoprotein oxidation, and antimicrobial and anticarcinogenic activity11. The compositions and levels of phytochemicals in plants can be influenced by genotype and environmental factors.

These include plant variety, organ, developmental stage, drought stress, and insect feeding6,12,13,14. Variation of glucosinolates and other nutrients in edible parts of Chinese kale

varieties has been previously described2,15,16. However, a description of the profile and content of glucosinolates and antioxidants among plant organs is unavailable. Therefore, the

objective of this study was to evaluate the variation of the composition and contents of glucosinolates and antioxidants in different organs of typical varieties of Chinese kale, and analyze

the genetic effects and correlation. The results will reveal the nutritional characteristics of these different varieties, provide consumer information on consumption of edible organs, and

offer ideas about possible uses for the non-edible organs. RESULTS CONTENTS OF THE MAIN HEALTH-PROMOTING PHYTOCHEMICALS Glucosinolates, four main antioxidants (chlorophylls, carotenoids,

vitamin C, and total phenolics), and antioxidant capacity were detected in all of the Chinese kale samples (Table 1). Thirteen glucosiolates were identified. Nine of these were detected in

all of the varieties and organs. Glucoiberin, glucoerucin, 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin, and gluconasturtiin were not detected in some samples. The total glucosinolate content ranged from 2.83 to

50.65 μmol g−1 DW, with an average value of 18.93 μmol g−1 DW (Table 1). Gluconapin was one of the most abundant glucosinolates in all of the varieties while glucoiberin, glucoalyssin,

gluconapolelferin, and 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin had low concentrations in some varieties and organs. Carotenoid content in samples ranged from 0.23 to 33.93 mg·100 g−1 FW. The ratio between

the highest and the lowest content between samples was as high as 150. The difference in the contents of total phenolics was small, but the ratio of the highest and the lowest content

reached a maximum of 2.34-fold. VARIANCE ANALYSIS OF GENETIC EFFECTS Almost all of the ratios of variance on glucosinolates were significant at the 0.01 or 0.05 levels, yet the respective

proportions were distinct (Table 2). The ratios of organ variance on glucosinolates were higher than the variety and interaction (variety × organ) variances. With the exceptions of

glucoiberin and sinigrin, the ratios of organ variance on glucosinolates all exceeded 50%. The ratio of organ variance for glucoerucin reached 93.0% (Table 2), and the content of glucoerucin

was mainly influenced by organ levels. The interaction variance values on glucosinolates surpassed the corresponding variety variance levels, except for glucoiberin, glucoraphanin, and

glucobrassicin. For example, the ratio of the interaction variance on 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin was 34.3%, which was exceeded only by the organ variance (50.9%). The ratio pattern of variance

on antioxidant contents and antioxidant capacity was similar to the glucosinolates (Table 3). Specifically, the ratios of organ variance on all of the antioxidants as well as antioxidant

capacity surpassed those of variety and interaction variances. The ratios of organ variance on chlorophylls, carotenoids and vitamin C were extremely high and the levels were all >90%.

The ratios of organ variance on total phenolics and antioxidant capacity were lower but the values still exceeded 60%. These results demonstrated that organ effects played major roles in the

variation of the antioxidant contents and antioxidant capacity. The results also showed that the total phenolics content and antioxidant capacity was influenced by interaction effects

(Table 3). PREDICTION OF GENETIC EFFECTS Genetic effects were further analyzed. The organ effects of inflorescences and roots were mostly positive, whereas organ effects of bolting stems,

leaves, and petioles were mostly negative for both total and individual glucosinolates (Table 4). Most of the organ effects were significant. Estimates of organ effects showed that the

inflorescence was better than other organs for improved glucoiberin, sinigrin, glucoraphanin, glucoalyssin, gluconapin, glucobrassicin, as well as total aliphatic and total indole

glucosinolates. Roots could significantly increase the contents of other glucosinolates (progoitrin, glucoerucin, gluconapolelferin, 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin, 4-methoxyglucobrassicin,

neoglucobrassicin, gluconasturtiin, total aromatic, and total glucosinolates). In contrast, the lowest levels of organ effects on glucoiberin, progoitrin, glucoraphanin, glucoerucin,

4-methoxyglucobrassicin, neoglucobrassicin, gluconasturtiin, and total aromatic glucosinolates were detected in leaves, and the lowest levels on other glucosinolate traits were observed in

petioles (Table 4). The value of organ effects of inflorescence on gluconapin was very high (11.415). Similarly, the levels of roots on gluconasturtiin and glucoerucin were 11.847 and 4.841,

respectively, and surpassed those of other organs. The predication values of organ effects on the main antioxidants and antioxidant capacity are displayed in Table 5. The highest

predication values for chlorophylls, carotenoids, and antioxidant capacity were in leaves, and the highest levels for vitamin C and total phenolics were in inflorescences. The lowest levels

for chlorophylls and vitamin C were in petioles and the lowest values for total phenolics and antioxidant capacity were in roots (Table 5). In addition to organ effects, nine interaction

effects, the corresponding variance ratios of which exceeded 20%, were estimated to determine the changes of glucosinolate concentrations among varieties and organs. The predicated

interaction effect levels were quite different (Table 6). For example, the predicated values for gluconapin and neoglucobrassicin were 13.420 and 1.788 in DFZC inflorescences, respectively.

However, the lowest levels for glucoiberin and sinigrin were also detected in the same sample. These results suggest that the distinct objectives will be best achieved by selecting suitable

combinations between variety and organ. The predication values of variety effects for glucosinolates possessed more than 20% phenotypic variance (Table 7). The contents of four

glucosinolates occurred unevenly among the different varieties. JL-01B had the highest values of glucoiberin, glucoraphanin, and glucobrassicin, while the peak level of sinigrin and bottom

level of glucobrassicin was found in SJCT. ANALYSIS OF GENETIC CORRELATION The phenotypic and genotypic correlation coefficients between pairs of individual and total glucosinolates were

significant at the 0.05 level (Table 8) and most traits were positively correlated. In addition, the values of phenotypic correlation were similar to genotypic correlation values. The

highest correlation coefficient was found between gluconasturtiin and total aromatic glucosinolates. This was followed by those of the pairs between gluconapin and total aliphatic

glucosinolates, as well as the pairs between total aliphatic glucosinolates and total glucosinolates. The coefficients of these were all >90%. Besides these pairs, the correlation

coefficients between pairs of glucoerucin, 4-methoxyglucobrassicin, gluconasturtiin, and total aromatic glucosinolates, which were richer in roots than in other organs, were also high with

values > 80%. The organ correlation coefficients between pairs of individual and total glucosinolates were positive. All of the negative correlation coefficients were found between

glucobrassicin and the four glucosinolates common in roots (glucoerucin, 4-methoxyglucobrassicin, gluconasturtiin, and total aromatic glucosinolates). Similar to phenotypic and genotypic

correlation coefficients, the organ correlation coefficients between pairs of the four above-mentioned glucosinolates were also high and the levels were close to 100%. The organ correlation

coefficients between pairs of the three glucosinolates with high anticarcinogenic activity (glucoiberin, glucoraphanin, and glucobrassicin) were all >90%. Estimates of the genetic

correlation components between glucosinolate and antioxidant capacity are presented in Table 8. Positive and significant phenotypic and genotypic correlations were observed for

glucobrassicin and sinigrin, and the values were <30% (Table 8). However, the organ correlation results suggested that six glucosinolates (glucoiberin, sinigrin, glucoraphanin,

gluconapin, glucobrassicin, and total indole glucosinolates) had positive and significant correlations with antioxidant capacity. The level between glucobrassicin and antioxidant capacity

was >60%. The correlation coefficients among pairs of main antioxidants and antioxidant capacity were dramatically significant at the 0.01 level (Table 9). All of the traits were

positively correlated to each other. The correlation coefficient of chlorophylls and carotenoids was higher than others, with a phenotypic correlation of 0.982 and a genotypic correlation of

0.989; followed by the correlation coefficient between total phenolics and antioxidant capacity with the phenotypic correlation of 0.781 and a genotypic correlation of 0.819. Similar

results were also observed for the two above-mentioned pairs for the organ correlation coefficient (Table 9). DISCUSSION Glucosinolates and antioxidants commonly accumulate in the vegetative

and reproductive organs of plants17,18. We studied the genetic effects and correlations of glucosinolates, main antioxidants and antioxidant capacity among the different organs in varieties

of Chinese kale. The results demonstrated that Chinese kale is a rich source of glucosinolates and antioxidants, but the levels in individual organs and varieties varied considerably.

Similar results have been reported in broccoli, cauliflower, kale, turnips, and _Arabidopsis_12,14,17,18. The glucosinolates can differ in composition and levels among the different organs

of individual plants17,19,20. Glucoerucin was the predominant glucosinolate in both seeds and roots of rocket salad, while dimeric 4-mercaptobutyl glucosinolate was the main component in the

leaves20. Similar results were reported by Petersen _et al_. (2002) in _Arabidopsis_21. In the current study, variance analysis indicated that the plant organ played a major role in

glucosinolate accumulation. The content of total glucosinolates in Chinese kale was highest in roots, and this value was at least three times as high as the value in other organs except for

inflorescences. These patterns were similar to results in other glucosinolate-containing species17,19,20. As glucosinolates provide a defense against herbivores and pathogens, the pattern of

differences among organs in Chinese kale is consistent with theories on the optimal distribution of defense substances17. We found that the levels of 4-methoxyglucobrassicin, glucoerucin,

and gluconasturtiin in roots were much higher than levels in other organs. Degradation products of glucoerucin inhibited _Pythium irregulare_ oospore germination and _Rhizoctonia solani_

soil colonization22. In addition, _Arabidopsis_ expressing the sorghum CYP79A1 or over-expressing the endogenous CYP79A2 accumulated p-hydroxybenzyl or benzyl glucosinolates, and had

increased resistance to the bacterial pathogen _Pseudomonas syringae_23. Therefore, the glucosinolate profiles in roots may be a defense adaptation to plant pathogens. Inflorescences, the

reproductive organ, had high concentrations of major aliphatic glucosinolates and glucobrassicin. Leaves and petioles, two important vegetative organs of Chinese kale, had low level of

glucosinolate. One possible reason is that the nutrients and defense compounds are transported from vegetative organs and accumulate gradually in reproductive organs as plants develop. The

concentrations of glucosinolates in the edible bolting stems were maintained at intermediate levels (Table 4). However, these levels are much higher than levels in other vegetables12,18,24.

These results suggest that, besides the edible part, other organs of Chinese kale, especially the roots and inflorescences, could potentially be used to produce functional foods and

biopesticides. Differences in individual and total glucosinolate contents were found among different varieties of Chinese kale. Genetic variation was an important factor determining the

glucosinolate profiles. This suggests that new varieties of Chinese kale with optimal contents of various types of glucosinolates could be developed. Similar effects of genotype on the

composition and content of glucosinolates have been observed in broccoli and other Brassica vegetables2,12,14,18,25. Some glucosinolates provide health benefits by reducing the risk of

certain cancers. For example, sulforaphane, the isothiocyanate product of glucoraphanin, is a potent inducer of mammalian detoxication and antioxidant (phase 2) enzyme activities that

protect against tumorgenesis26. Glucobrassicin is the precursor of indole-3-carbinol that, along with sulforaphane, is a potent anticancer compound found in Brasscia vegetables26,27,28.

JL-01B, in this study, could also be used for development of a functional variety, because it is rich in anticarcigenic glucosinolates, such as glucoiberin, glucoraphanin, and

glucobrassicin. DFZC is also a good candidate because of its high level of glucoraphanin. The correlation results indicated that the above three anticarcigenic glucosinolates could be

increased simultaneously in selective breeding of Chinese kale because of their high positive correlations (Table 8). During improvement of anticarcinogenic potency, the positive sensory

attributes and nutrient quality of Chinese kale must not be affected by selective breeding. For instance, 2-propenyl isothiocyanate derived from sinigrin is associated with pungency,

bitterness, and lachrymatory effects. Progoitrin can have a goitrogenic effect on animals14,18,29. However, the high level of positive correlations between the three anticarcinogenic

glucosinolates and sinigrin and progoitrin suggest that will be difficult to enhance the anticarcinogenic qualities without deleterious side effects. Some glucosinolates contribute to the

antioxidant capability of the plant. Glucoraphasatin, which is the main glucosinolate in radish sprouts, displayed antioxidant activity and contributed to the total antioxidant capacity of

radish sprout extract30. Glucoerucin and 4-methoxyglucobrassicin are good antioxidants because of their ability to decompose hydroperoxides and hydrogen peroxide20,31. In contrast to

anticarcinogenic ability, the relationship between glucosinolates and antioxidant activity is unclear. We analyzed the correlations between glucosinolate and antioxidant capacity (Table 8)

and found that glucobrassicin and sinigrin had positive phenotypic correlations with antioxidant capacity. Six glucosinolates (glucoiberin, sinigrin, glucoraphanin, gluconapin,

glucobrassicin, and total indole glucosinolates) also had positive organ correlations with antioxidant capacity. The value between glucobrassicin and antioxidant capacity exceeded 60%. The

results imply that these kinds of glucosinolates, especially glucobrassicin, are involved in plant antioxidant activity. Antioxidants are health-promoting phytochemicals in horticultural

crops. Carotenoids, vitamin C, total phenolics, and chlorophylls have high antioxidant potential and help provide protection against many types of cancer8,9,10,32,33. The plant antioxidant

capacity is reflected by the synergetic effect of multiple antioxidants. Our results indicate that Chinese kale contains high amounts of main antioxidants and has high antioxidant capacity.

The high positive correlations between antioxidant capacity and main antioxidants (carotenoids, vitamin C, total phenolics, and chlorophylls) imply that the main antioxidants tested

contribute to the total antioxidant capacity in Chinese kale and that they could be improved simultaneously (Table 9). Variance analysis of genetic effects indicated that organ played a

predominant role in the contents of main antioxidants and antioxidant capacity as it did in the content of glucosinolates (Table 4). Therefore, it could be easier to select suitable

combinations of organs and varieties for utilization of the health-promoting compounds. Although the content of vitamin C in bolting stems was at a low levels among the organs (Table 5), the

content was higher than levels in many other vegetables24,34. In conclusion, Chinese kale is a rich source of health-promoting phytochemicals, including glucosinolates and antioxidants. The

highest concentrations of individual and total glucosinolates were found in roots and inflorescences, respectively, while the highest levels of main antioxidants (carotenoids, vitamin C,

total phenolics, and chlorophylls) and antioxidant capacity occurred in inflorescences and leaves. The non-edible organs (roots, inflorescences, and leaves) have potential for other uses,

such as functional foods and biopesticides. JL-01B and DFZC are good candidates for daily consumption and breeding programs since they had high levels of anticarcinogenic glucosinolates in

the bolting stems. The genetic effect of organ played a primary role in the accumulation of glucosinolates and antioxidants, while the interaction effects were significant for some

compounds. High positive correlations between pairs of anticarcinogenic glucosinolates (glucoiberin, glucoraphanin, and glucobrassicin) and main antioxidants, respectively, indicated that

they could be increased simultaneously by selective breeding of Chinese kale varieties. However, it will be difficult to reduce the bitterness that accompanies the enhancement of

anticarcinogenic glucosinolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS SAMPLE COLLECTION AND PREPARATION Six varieties (cv: ZHSN, SJCT, CHDR, DFZC, FZHH, and JL-01B) of Chinese kale were selected. The seeds

were sown in trays containing peat and vermiculite (3:1) in a greenhouse at Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, China) with a daily high temperature of 25 °C and a night temperature of 20 °C.

Three weeks later, 50 seedlings of each variety with 3–5 true leaves were transplanted into an outdoor field with a row distance of 40 cm and an individual plant distance of 30 cm. Water and

fertilizer were applied as necessary. The whole plants were harvested when the bolting stems with inflorescences were as tall as the apical leaves. This indicates that the edible organ was

mature. Plants with equivalent size were selected, and the harvest was conducted in early morning. The plants were placed on ice and transported to the laboratory. For each variety, five

plants represented a replicate, and three independent replicates were taken for analysis. The sampled plants were divided into five parts, namely, inflorescences, bolting stems, leaves,

petioles, and roots. They were surface-sterilized with a solution of 50 mg kg−1 NaClO for 1 min and dried with a hair drier for 1 min. Parts of fresh samples were analyzed for chlorophylls,

total carotenoids, and vitamin C. Other parts were frozen, lyophilized in a freeze dryer (VirTis Inc., New York, USA), and stored at −20 °C for analyses of glucosinolates, total phenolics,

and antioxidant capacity. GLUCOSINOLATE COMPOSITION AND CONTENTS Glucosinolates were extracted and analyzed as previously described2. Briefly, freeze-dried samples (100 mg) were boiled in 4 

ml water for 10 min. The supernatant was collected after centrifugation (5 min, 7000 g), and the residues were washed once with water (4 ml), centrifuged, and then combined with the previous

extract. The aqueous extract was applied to a DEAE-Sephadex A-25 (40 mg) column (pyridine acetate form) (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ). The column was washed three times with 1 ml pyridine

acetate (20 mM) and twice with 1 ml water. The glucosinolates were converted into their desulpho analogues by overnight treatment with 100 μl of 0.1% (1.4 units) aryl sulphatase (Sigma),

and the desulphoglucosinolates were eluted with 2 × 0.5 ml water. HPLC analysis of desulphoglucosinolates was conducted using a Waters HPLC instrument equipped with a Model 2996 PDA

absorbance detector (Waters, USA). Samples (20 μl) were separated at 30 °C on a Waters Spherisorb C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm i.d.; 5 μm particle size) using acetonitrile and water at a flow

rate of 1.0 ml min−1. The procedure employed isocratic elution with 1.5% acetonitrile for the first 5 min; a linear gradient to 20% acetonitrile over the next 15 min followed by isocratic

elution with 20% acetonitrile for the final 10 min. Absorbance was detected at 226 nm. DETERMINATION OF CHLOROPHYLL CONTENTS Chlorophyll content was analyzed as previously described35. Fresh

samples (1 g fresh weight (FW)) were ground, extracted with 15 ml 80% acetone and centrifuged at 3000 rpm at room temperature for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and total chlorophyll

content was measured by reading the absorbance at 652 nm with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-2500, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). The chlorophyll content was expressed as mg 100 g−1 FW.

DETERMINATION OF TOTAL CAROTENOID CONTENTS Total carotenoid content was analyzed as previously described35. Samples (1 g, FW) were ground in a mixture of acetone and petroleum ether (1:1,

v/v) and extracted twice with the same solution. After washing several times with water, the upper phase was collected and combined as a crude extract. The extracts were brought up to 25 ml

with petroleum ether. Total carotenoid content was determined by reading the absorbance at 451 nm with a spectrophotometer. Total carotenoid content was expressed as mg 100 g−1 FW.

DETERMINATION OF VITAMIN C CONTENTS Vitamin C content was analyzed as previously described35. Frozen samples (3 g) were ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen, extracted twice with 10 ml

1.0% (w/v) oxalic acid and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min. Each sample was filtered through a 0.45-µm cellulose acetate filter. HPLC analysis of vitamin C was conducted using a Waters

instrument with a Model 2996 PDA detector (Waters Inc., Milford, USA). Samples (20 µl) were separated at room temperature on a Waters Spherisorb C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm id; 5 µm particle

size) using a 0.1% oxalic acid solvent at a flow rate of 1.0 ml min−1. The amount of ascorbic acid was calculated from absorbance values at 243 nm, using authentic ascorbic acid as a

standard. Results were expressed as mg 100 g−1 FW. DETERMINATION OF TOTAL PHENOLIC CONTENTS The total phenolics were extracted with 50% ethanol and incubated at room temperature for 24 h in

darkness. The suspension was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature and the supernatant was collected. Phenolic compounds were determined using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent by

reading the absorbance at 760 nm as previously described36. Gallic acid was used as a standard and the results were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE) g−1 dry weight (DW).

DETERMINATION OF ANTIOXIDANT CAPACITY Antioxidant capacity was determined using the Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) method of Benzie and Strain (1996)37. The working FRAP reagent

was prepared daily by mixing 300 mM acetate buffer (pH 3.6), 20 mM ferric chloride, and 10 mM 2,4,6-tripyridyl-S-triazine in 40 mM HCl in a ratio of 10:1:1 (v/v/v). The extracts (300 μl)

were added to 2.7 ml of the FRAP working solution incubated at 37 °C and vortexed. The absorbance was recorded at 593 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-2500, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto,

Japan) after the mixture had been incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. FRAP values were calculated from FeSO4·7H2O standard curves and expressed as µmol g−1 DW. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The genetic

model developed by Zhu (1996)38 was used for the analysis of inheritance. The model used for the analysis is: $${{\rm{Y}}}_{{\rm{ijk}}}={\rm{\mu

}}+{{\rm{G}}}_{{\rm{i}}}+{{\rm{E}}}_{{\rm{j}}}+{{\rm{GE}}}_{{\rm{ij}}}+{{\rm{e}}}_{{\rm{ijk}}},$$ where Yijk = the phenotypic mean of the cross of variety i and organ j in the kth block; μ =

 population mean; Gi = the variety effect; Ej = the organ effect; GEij = the variety × organ effect; and eijk = the residual error. The data were analyzed with TestR Model by MINQUE method

for estimating variances and covariances and calculating the ratios of genetic variance over phenotypic variance. All of the data analyses were performed with QGAStation Version 2.0

software. All of the factors were considered as random. The genetic effects were predicted by the adjusted unbiased prediction method (AUP) method39, while standard errors of the statistics

were obtained by the Jackknife resampling method and Student’s _t_-tests were performed for testing the significance of the obtained parameters40. REFERENCES * Abellán, Á., Domínguez-Perles,

R., Moreno, D. A. & García-Viguera, C. Sorting out the value of cruciferous sprouts as sources of bioactive compounds for nutrition and health. _Nutrients_ 11(2), pii: E429 (2019).

Article  Google Scholar  * Sun, B., Liu, N., Zhao, Y. T., Yan, H. Z. & Wang, Q. M. Variation of glucosinolates in three edible parts of Chinese kale (_Brassica alboglabra_ Bailey)

varieties. _Food Chem._ 124, 941–947 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Sun, B., Yan, H. Z., Liu, N., Wei, J. & Wang, Q. M. Effect of 1-MCP treatment on postharvest quality

characters, antioxidants and glucosinolates of Chinese kale. _Food Chem._ 131, 519–526 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Hansen, M., Møller, P., Sørensen, H. & Cantwell, M.

Glucosinolates in broccoli stored under controlled atmosphere. _J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci._ 120, 1069–1074 (1995). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Halkier, B. A. & Du, L. C. The

biosynthesis of glucosinolates. _Trends Plant Sci._ 2, 425–431 (1997). Article  Google Scholar  * Halkier, B. A. & Gershenzon, J. Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. _Annu. Rev.

Plant Biol._ 57, 303–333 (2006). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Abdull Razis, A. F. & Noor, N. M. Naturally-occurring glucosinolates, glucoraphanin and glucoerucin, are antagonists to

aryl hydrocarbon receptor as their chemopreventive potency. _Asian Pac. J. Cancer P._ 16(14), 5801–5805 (2015). Article  Google Scholar  * Sun, T. _et al_. Carotenoid metabolism in plants:

the role of plastids. _Mol. Plant_ 11, 58–74 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  * Travica, N. _et al_. Vitamin C Status and Cognitive Function. _A Systematic Review._ 9(9), Pii: E960 (2017).

Google Scholar  * Gayosso-García Sancho, L. E., Yahia, E. M. & González-Aguilar, G. A. Identification and quantification of phenols, carotenoids, and vitamin C from papaya (_Carica

papaya_ L., cv. Maradol) fruit determined by HPLC-DAD-MS/MS-ESI. _Food Res. Int._ 44, 1284–1291 (2011). Article  Google Scholar  * Costea, T., Nagy, P., Ganea, C., Szöllősi, J. & Mocanu,

M. M. Molecular Mechanisms and Bioavailability of Polyphenols in Prostate Cancer. _Int. J. Mol. Sci._ 20(5), pii:E1062 (2019). Article  Google Scholar  * Kushad, M. M. _et al_. Variation of

glucosinolates in vegetable crops of _Brassica oleracea_. _J. Agr. Food Chem._ 47, 1541–1548 (1999). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Fahey, J. W., Zalcmann, A. T. & Talalay, P. The

chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. _Phytochemistry_ 56, 5–51 (2001). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Cartea, M. E., Velasco, P., Obregón,

S., Padilla, G. & Haro, A. Seasonal variation in glucosinolate content in _Brassica oleracea_ crops grown in northwestern Spain. _Phytochemistry_ 69, 403–410 (2008). Article  CAS 

Google Scholar  * Zhang, S. H. _et al_. The nutritive value of different strains of cabbage mustard. _J. Hebei Normal Univ. Sci. Technol._ 18, 58–61 (2004). Google Scholar  * Si, Y. _et al_.

Analysis on composition and content of glucosinolates in different genotypes of Chinese kale. _China Vegetables_ 6, 7–13 (2009). Google Scholar  * Brown, P. D., Tokuhisa, J. G., Reichelt,

M. & Gershenzon, J. Variation of glucosinolate accumulation among different organs and developmental stages of _Arabidopsis thaliana_. _Phytochemistry_ 62, 471–481 (2003). Article  CAS 

Google Scholar  * Padilla, G., Cartea, M. E., Velasco, P., Haro, A. & Ordás, A. Variation of glucosinolates in vegetable crops of _Brassica rapa_. _Phytochemistry_ 68, 536–545 (2007).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Sang, J. P., Minchinton, I. R., Johnstone, P. K. & Truscott, R. J. W. Glucosinolate profiles in the seed, root and leaf tissue of cabbage, mustard,

rapeseed, radish and swede. _Can. J. Plant Sci._ 64, 77–93 (1984). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Kim, S. J. & Ishii, G. Glucosinolate profiles in the seeds, leaves and roots of rocket

salad (_Eruca satica_ Mill.) and anti-oxidative activities of intact plant powder and purified 4-methoxyglucobrassicin. _Soil Sci. Plant Nutr._ 52, 394–400 (2006). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Petersen, B. L. _et al_. Composition and content of glucosinolates in developing _Arabidopsis thaliana_. _Planta_ 214, 562–571 (2002). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Manici, L.

M. _et al_. Suppressive activity of some glucosinolate enzyme degradation products on _Pythium irregulare_ and _Rhizoctonia solani_ in sterile soil. _Pest Manag. Sci._ 56, 921–926 (2000).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Brader, G., Mikkelsen, M. D., Halkier, B. A. & Palva, E. T. Altering glucosinolate profiles modulates disease resistance in plants. _Plant J._ 46, 758–767

(2006). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Volden, J., Bengtsson, G. B. & Wichlund, T. Glucosinolates, L-ascorbic acid, total phenols, anthocyanins, antioxidant capacities and colour in

cauliflower (_Brassica oleracea_ L. ssp. _botrytis_); effects of long-term freezer storage. _Food Chem._ 112, 967–976 (2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Yan, X. F. & Chen, S. X.

Regulation of plant glucosinolate metabolism. _Planta_ 226, 1343–1352 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhang, Y. S. & Talalay, P. Anticarcinogenic activities of organic

isothiocyanates: chemistry and mechanism. _Cancer Res._ 54, 1976–1981 (1994). Google Scholar  * Shan, Y. Q., Zhang, J. L. & He, H. J. The property research of glucosinolate and

sulforaphane in Cruciferae plants._ Food Sci. Technol._ 32, 110–111 (2007). Google Scholar  * Lou, P. _et al_. Quantitative trait loci for glucosinolate accumulation in _Brassica rapa_

leaves. _New Phytol._ 179, 1017–1032 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Van Doorn, H. E. _et al_. The glucosinolates sinigrin and progoitrin are important determinants for taste

preference and bitterness of Brussels sprouts. _J. Sci. Food Agric._ 78, 30–38 (1998). Article  Google Scholar  * Barillari, J. _et al_. Kaiware Daikon (_Raphanus sativus_ L.) extract: a

naturally multipotent chemopreventive agent. _J. Agr. Food Chem._ 56, 7823–7830 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Barillari, J. _et al_. Direct antioxidant activity of purified

glucoerucin, the dietary secondary metabolite contained in rocket (_Eruca sativa_ Mill.) seeds and sprouts. _J. Agr. Food Chem._ 53, 2475–2482 (2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Lanfer-Marquez, U. M., Barros, R. M. C. & Sinnecker, P. Antioxidant activity of chlorophylls and their derivatives. _Food Res. Int._ 38, 885–891 (2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Reddy, V. K., Sreeramulu, C. & Raghunath, D. M. Antioxidant activity of fresh and dry fruits commonly consumed in India. _Food Res. Int._ 43, 285–288 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  *

Bahorun, T., Luximon-Ramma, A., Crozier, A. & Aruoma, O. I. Total phenol, flavonoid, proanthocyanidin and vitamin C levels and antioxidant activities of Mauritian vegetables. _J. Sci.

Food Agr._ 84, 1553–1561 (2004). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Sun, B., Yan, H. Z., Zhang, F. & Wang, Q. M. Effects of plant hormones on main health-promoting compounds and antioxidant

capacity of Chinese kale. _Food Res. Int._ 48, 359–366 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ainsworth, E. A. & Gillespie, K. M. Estimation of total phenolic content and other

oxidation substrates in plant tissues using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. _Nat. Protoc._ 2, 875–877 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Benzie, I. F. & Strain, J. J. The ferric reducing

ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. _Anal. Biochem._ 239, 70–76 (1996). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhu, J. Analytic methods for seed models

with genotype × environment interactions. _Acta Genet. Sin._ 23, 56–58. (1996). MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zhu, J. & Weir, B. S. Diallel analysis for sex-linked and

maternal effects. _Theor. Appl. Genet._ 92, 1–9 (1996). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Miller, R. G. The jackknife: a review. _Biometrika_ 61, 1–15 (1974). MathSciNet  MATH  Google

Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31270343 and 31500247), and the Technology Innovation Programme of

Zhejiang Province (ZJWR0102001). AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * These authors contributed equally: Jiaqi Chang and Mengyu Wang. AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Key Laboratory of Horticultural

Plant Growth, Development and Quality Improvement, Department of Horticulture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China Jiaqi Chang, Mengyu Wang & Qiaomei Wang * College of

Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China Yue Jian, Fen Zhang & Bo Sun * Institute of Bioinformatics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China Jun Zhu

Authors * Jiaqi Chang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Mengyu Wang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed

 Google Scholar * Yue Jian View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Fen Zhang View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar * Jun Zhu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Qiaomei Wang View author publications You can also search for this

author inPubMed Google Scholar * Bo Sun View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS Fen Zhang, Qiaomei Wang, and Bo Sun conceived and

designed the experiments; Jiaqi Chang, Mengyu Wang, and Yue Jian performed the experiments; Jiaqi Chang, Jun Zhu, and Fen Zhang analyzed the data; and Mengyu Wang and Bo Sun wrote the paper.

All of the authors gave final approval for publication. CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence to Fen Zhang or Bo Sun. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing

interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. RIGHTS AND

PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any

medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The

images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not

included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly

from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Chang, J., Wang,

M., Jian, Y. _et al._ Health-promoting phytochemicals and antioxidant capacity in different organs from six varieties of Chinese kale. _Sci Rep_ 9, 20344 (2019).

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56671-w Download citation * Received: 06 November 2019 * Accepted: 16 December 2019 * Published: 30 December 2019 * DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56671-w SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not

currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative