News Reader.info

ABSTRACT Gastric ulcer or peptic ulcer is a common disease worldwide. Basically, it develops when there is an imbalance between the protective and aggressive factors, especially at the

luminal surface of epithelial cells. Thus, there is a constant interest in research new drugs for treatment of gastric ulcer. The snail secretion is a dense mucous, that covers the external

surface of the snails, with important functions for the survival of snails. The biological proprieties of snail _Helix Aspersa Muller_ mucus it has been known for centuries to treat human

disorders in particular for skin disease. Recently the use of snail mucus has seen a worldwide increase, as a component in cosmetic product and it has been used in particular for the

management of wound and skin disorders. In this study we use a murine model of ethanol intragastric administration which has been widely used to test the drugs efficacies and to explore the

underlying mechanism for gastric ulcer development. The intragastric ethanol administration causes several mucosal damages and an induction of a severe inflammatory response. Our results

show a significant protective effect of snail secretion filtrate in reducing macroscopic and histological lesions, as well the protective effect on mucus content, oxidative stress and

inflammatory response. In conclusion this study demonstrate the protective effect of intragastrical snail secretion filtrate, in a model of ethanol-induced gastric ulcer in mice, suggesting

its possible useful use in the treatment or prevention of gastric ulcer. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS BARRIER EFFECT AND WOUND HEALING ACTIVITY OF THE MEDICAL DEVICE REF-FTP78 IN

THE TREATMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE Article Open access 12 April 2022 A COMBINATION OF CARBONATES AND OPUNTIA FICUS-INDICA EXTRACT PROTECTS ESOPHAGEAL CELLS AGAINST SIMULATED

ACIDIC AND NON-ACIDIC REFLUX IN VITRO Article Open access 27 September 2024 ANTIMICROBIAL EFFICACY OF EGYPTIAN _EREMINA DESERTORUM_ AND _HELIX ASPERSA_ SNAIL MUCUS WITH A NOVEL APPROACH TO

THEIR ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND WOUND HEALING POTENCIES Article Open access 21 December 2021 INTRODUCTION The gastric ulcer or peptic ulcer is a disease that affect a significative number of

people worldwide. Basically, it develops when there is an imbalance between the protective and aggressive factors at the luminal surface of epithelial cells. The most common factors

contributes to the development of gastric ulcer are the _Helicobacter pylori_ infection, long term use of aspirin or other NSAID, and other factors such as alcohol drinking, smoking and

dietary habits1,2,3. The causes mentioned above cause an imbalance in normal mucosal barrier. In fact, normally there is a layer of adherent mucus on gastric luminal surface. Furthermore,

the gastric mucus act as protective layer for the underlying epithelium, from gastric juice and pepsin. The gastric mucus content is normally balanced by the secretion of new mucus to

maintain a continuous barrier, against the continuous action of gastric juice and pepsin4. For the treatment of gastric ulcer several drugs are available, the common approach is based on the

use of H receptor antagonism and proton pump inhibitors, or the use of drugs with mechanical protective action on gastric mucosa5. However a prolonged use of these drugs may cause serious

adverse effect6. Thus, there is a constant interest in research in new drugs for treatment of gastric ulcer, with a particular interest in substances of natural origin. The snail secretion

or mucus is a dense mucous that covers the external surface of the snail. This mucus is produced by a particularly salivary epidermal glands in snail. The mucus has various function for the

life of snails with his adhesive, emollient, protective and reparative proprieties7. The _Helix Aspersa Muller_ mucus, is still not well characterized composition7. In fact, the bioactive

substances present in this peculiar natural product, make it a unique product not replicable in the laboratory and with synthetic compounds. The biological proprieties of _Helix Aspersa

Muller_ snail mucus it has been known for centuries to treat human disorders in particular for skin disease. Recently the use of snail mucus has seen a worldwide increase, as a component in

cosmetic product and it has been used in particular for the management of wound and treatment of chronic bronchitis8,9. It has been seen that the snail mucus components are able to

stimulated the formation of dermal components, in particular the formation of collagen and elastin, and to minimized the damage generated by oxidative stress and free radicals10. It has

shown to possess also other important biological properties such as antimicrobial activity and protective effect in wound repair11. In fact, the effectiveness of _Helix Aspersa_ extract has

been demonstrated as a safe and effective alternative treatment in open wound management of partial thickness burns in adults, favoring its re-epithelialization9. These important properties

of snail slime and in particular pro-epithelizing and wound repair are due to the peculiar chemical composition of this compound12. Moreover, many of the components present in snail slime

play a fundamental role in homeostasis and protection of the gastric mucosa. In particular a protective effect in the gastric mucosa has already been demonstrated for some of the components

most present in the Snail Secretion Filtrate (SSF) such as, collagen, elastin, glycolic acid and allantoin13,14. However, there are numerous other compounds present in snail slime that

contribute to its peculiar protective action, such as the mineral component15, due for example to the presence of copper in the SSF. In fact, copper has been shown to have an anti-ulcer

action16. Finally, also the mucopolysaccharide component naturally present in snail slime plays a key role in the protective activity on mucous tissues17,18. Therefore, on the basis of the

known properties of snail slime and the pathophysiology of gastric ulcer, the hypothesis of this study is that oral treatment with SSF may be a useful tool in maintaining homeostasis of the

gastric mucosa, and in the prevention or treatment of inflammation of the gastric mucosa and therefore of the gastric ulcer. The murine model of intragastric ethanol administration has been

widely used to test the drugs efficacies and to explore the underlying mechanism for gastric ulcer development, the intragastric ethanol administration causes several mucosal damage and an

induction of a severe inflammatory response19,20. Alcohol also induce an important increase in oxidative stress by the generation of reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation, the

oxidative stress play a key role in gastric ulcer disease21. In this study for the first time we study the potentially protective effect of Snail Secretion Filtrate in an experimental model

of ethanol induced gastric ulcer in mice. Evaluating the effect on gastric mucosal, oxidative stress and inflammatory response. RESULTS SNAIL SECRETION FILTRATE (SSF) CHEMICAL

CHARACTERIZATION Figure 1 panel a, reports the qualitative and quantitative properties and composition of SSF. The SSF used in this study showed a high content in glycolic acid and collagen

follow by allantoin and elastin as showed by the chemical characterization showed in Fig. 1 and supplementary figure S1-S8. The dose of SSF used in this experimental model of ethanol-induced

acute ulcer in mice was calculated based on maximum volume in ml/kg that can be given by o.s. in mice, so as to gradually obtain a greater surface of gastric mucosa in contact with SSF. In

particular were chosen as a high dose 15 ml/kg, medium 7.5 ml/kg and low 3 ml/kg. The total protein content in SSF was 25,6 mg/ml. The Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel

electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) profiles of proteins pattern of SSF from _Helix Aspersa Muller_ are shown in Supplementary Figure S1. EFFECT OF SSF ON MACROSCOPIC EXAMINATION One hours after EtOH

gastric ulcer induction, as show in Fig. 2 the stomachs from EtOH group (the negative control group) showed a significant presence in mucosa hyperemia and mucosal damage with large ulcer

formation. Instead the treatment with omeprazole (used as positive control) at dose of 20 mg/kg significant prevent the ulceration and mucosal damage induced by EtOH. The treatment with SSF

showed a dose dependent protective effect as showed in Fig. 2 by the graphs of gastric ulcer index and the preventive index. In particular the dose of 15 ml/kg and 7.5 ml/kg showed an

important reduction in mucosal damage and ulceration compared to EtOH group. EFFECT OF SSF ON HISTOLOGICAL DAMAGE As show in Fig. 3a, compared to stomach tissue from control group the EtOH

group showed a significant increase in tissue damaged characterized by a significant epithelial cell loss, edema, hemorrhagic damage and abundant presence of inflammatory cells . The

treatment with SSF showed a dose dependent protective effect in particular with a significant protective effect on epithelial cell loss. Lower magnification of histological images on both

upper and lower mucosa are shown in supplementary figure S8-S13. The presence of inflammatory cells has been confirmed thought MPO assay that showed a significant increase in MPO in EtOH

group compared to control group. As show in Fig. 3b, the treatment with omeprazole significant prevent the increase in MPO, for the SSF treatment only the dose of 7.5 ml/kg and 15 ml/kg

showed a significant protective effect on increase in MPO induced by EtOH. EFFECT OF SSF ON MUCOSA GLYCOPROTEINS AND COLLAGEN CONTENTS Mucosa glycoprotein evaluation was performed using PAS

staining. As show in Fig. 4, one hour after the EtOH administration, in the stomach from mice of EtOH group there was a significant decrease in PAS staining compared to sham group. The loss

in mucosa glycoprotein was significantly reduced by pre-treatment with omeprazole. Compared to EtOH group the treatment with SSF at dose of 3 ml/Kg did not show any notable protective

effect, instead the dose of 7.5 and 15 ml/kg of SSF showed a significant protective effect in a dose dependent manner compared to the EtOH group. Through Masson staining collagen can be dyed

in blue, by which we can roughly evaluate the healing effect at the macro level and stains also showed the formation of granulation tissue ad collagen disorganization in the gastric wall.

As show in Fig. 5, in the EtOH group stain indicated fragmented and disorganized collagen fibers, while omeprazole group showed a significative protective effect. For the SSF treatment only

the dose of 15 ml/Kg showed a significant protective effect. EFFECT OF SSF ON MUCUS CONTENTS AND OXIDATIVE STRESS The mucus contents assay was performed by alcian blue binding assay. As

showed by the graph in Fig. 6a, the mucus contents was significantly reduced in the EtOH group compared to the control group. When compared to EtOH group, the omeprazole group showed a

significant decrease in mucus contents loss, the treatment with SSF showed a dose dependent protective effect on mucus contents loss due to EtOH administration. To assess the effect of on

SSF on oxidative stress we evaluated the levels of MDA as index of lipid peroxidation, as show in Fig. 6b intragastrical EtOH administration induced a significant increase MDA levels, while

the treatment with omeprazole prevent this increase in MDA in a significant manner, the treatment with SSF showed a dose dependent protective effect on mucus. Next we observed a significant

reduction in CAT and SOD induced by EtOH administration that has been significantly antagonized by omeprazole pre-treatment. As show in Fig. 6c,d treatment with SSF at the dose of 3 ml/kg

did not demonstrate a significant protective effect instead the doses of 7.5 ml/kg and 15 ml/kg showed a significant protective effect in a dose dependent manner. EFFECT OF SSF ON PGE2 AND

INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE As show in Fig. 7a, through ELISA assay we evaluated the levels PGE2 in gastric tissue homogenates, compared to control group EtOH administration induced a significant

decrease in PGE2, significantly antagonized by omeprazole pre-treatment. The treatment with SSF at the dose of 3 ml/kg did not demonstrate a significant protective effect instead the doses

of 7.5 ml/kg and 15 ml/kg showed a significant protective effect in a dose dependent manner. Figure 7b–d, showed the results for the ELISA assays for mayor pro inflammatory cytokines IL-6,

IL-1β, TNF-α, respectively. EtOH administration induced a significant increase in IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α levels significantly antagonized by omeprazole pre-treatment. The treatment SSF at the

dose of 3 ml/kg did not demonstrate a significant protective effect instead the doses of 7.5 ml/kg and 15 ml/kg showed a significant protective effect in a dose dependent manner. DISCUSSION

Several factors contributes to gastric ulcer development, such as drug abuse, alcoholism, endocrine dyscrasia and bacterial helicobacter pylori infection, which can cause mucosal barrier

damage through alteration in gastric acid secretion and characterized by hemorrhage and severe inflammatory response22,23. A key event in gastric ulcer formation is the imbalance in the

gastric mucosa between the defensive factor such as mucin, prostaglandin, bicarbonate nitric oxide and growth factor, and the offensive factor such as increased secretion of pepsin and

gastric acid. Thus inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and neutrophilic infiltration has been show a key role in pathophysiology of gastric ulcer, on the other hand endogenous

antioxidant, mucus layer acts as protective agents24,25. The common approach in treating the gastric ulcer is based on H receptor antagonism and proton pump inhibitors5. These class of drugs

may cause serious adverse effect when used for prolonged time6. Recently, several studies has highlighted the ability of snail secretion (or snail mucus), to improve skin conditions thanks

to its peculiar proprieties such as emollient, moisturizing, lubricating and protective, especially to prevent skin damage, and thus there is a growing interest in the use of this compound

in cosmetology26. Furthermore the _Helix Aspersa Muller_ secretion has shown to possess other important biological properties such as, antimicrobial activity11 and wound repair27. Several

studies have highlighted the absence of cytotoxic effects in different cell lines such as in human keratinocytes, human dermal fibroblasts (MRC-5) and murine embryo fibroblasts

(NIH-3T3)12,27. These effect of Snail mucus is due also to his peculiar mechanical proprieties due mucopolysaccharide contents, on the other hand these effects are due to the peculiar

contents of active molecules12. As previously demonstrated, the two molecules the glycolic acid and allantoin, most present in snail slime were believed to be an essential component for the

biological activities of snail slime9, however recently has been demonstrated that the mucus _in toto_ has a greater effect than that of the individual molecules27. Thus, a synergism in

activity of several molecules present in snail secretion cannot be excluded, factor that make a snail secretion a peculiar compound with important biological proprieties. In fact, beyond all

molecules contained in snail secretion also the specific ratio of these components in the natural snail secretion is a key factor for the biological activity. So, in this study we consider

the crude Snail Secretion Filtrate (SSF) form _Helix Aspersa Muller_ as compound “_in toto_” and it is not possible to understand which one the molecule is responsible for the biological

activity. In this study due to the route of administration and the maximum volume in ml/kg that can be given by o.s. in mice28, we consider three dose of SSF as high dose of 15 ml/kg, medium

of 7.5 ml/kg and low 3 ml/kg, to gradually obtain a greater surface of gastric mucosa in contact with SSF21. Considering the proteins content in the SSF the respective dosage as mg/kg were

respectively 384 mg/kg, 192 mg/kg and 76,8 mg/kg. We choose an experimental model of ethanol intragastric administration in mice, that has been widely used to explore the underlying

mechanism for gastric ulcer development and thus to test the efficacy of new drugs. The intragastric administration of ethanol cause several mucosa damage and an induction of a severe

inflammatory response and oxidative stress19,20,21. In our study, the results of macroscopic gastric evaluation after EtOH administration showed significant protective effect of SSF on

gastric mucosa. In particular, the treatment SSF at the dose of 3 ml/kg did not demonstrate a significant protective effect instead the doses of 7.5 ml/kg and 15 ml/kg showed a significant

protective effect in a dose dependent manner. Also, on histological evaluation of gastric mucosa we confirmed the protective effect of SSF, in agreement with macroscopic score. A fundamental

step in involved in the complex event of gastric ulcer formation is the infiltration of neutrophil, in particular activated neutrophil are responsible for increase in oxidative stress and

inflammatory response29,30. Our results on MPO evaluation as index of inflammatory cell infiltration, showed that doses of 7.5 ml/kg and 15 ml/kg showed a significant protective effect in a

dose dependent manner on neutrophil infiltration. A standard goal in treating gastric ulcer is preventing the decrease or degradation of gastric mucus, that act as a natural protective agent

on gastric mucosa31. Gastric mucus consist of mucin type glycoproteins and the depletion in gastric wall mucus it has been seen to be closely related to the gastric ulcer pathology32,33.

EtOH induced gastric ulcer is also responsible for the reduction of collagen within gastric tissue34. Therefore, we evaluated both the presence of glycoproteins (PAS staining) and collagen

(Masson staining) following the administration of EtOH, and our results show that this has produced a significant reduction in both cases, while the treatment with SSF at doses of 7.5 ml/kg

and 15 ml/kg showed a significant protective effect. These results are also confirmed by the results of mucus content performed by Alcian blue staining. According to the results mentioned so

far we have found that the treatment with SSF at doses of 7.5 ml/kg and 15 ml/kg showed a significant protective effect on oxidative stress induced by EtOH, and in particular SSF treatment

significantly prevent the increase in MDA levels, and the depletion in CAT and SOD levels. Oxidative stress in related to both initial stage of gastric ulcer development and with the

worsening of the pathology35. Has previously demonstrated the gastric mucosa homeostasis is regulated by both the control of oxidative stress status and by secretion of several mediators

such as cytokines and prostaglandin. In particular, prostaglandin play a key role on the state of health of the mucosa by regulating several factors such as the stimulation of mucus and

bicarbonate secretion, maintaining the integrity of epithelial cells and improving mucosal mucosal blood flow, in particular PGE2 showed an important role in regulation of these function, an

thus PGE2 act as a gastro protective agent36,37. Gastric ulcer and an gastric ulcer healing has been seen previously are regulated by the levels of prostaglandin an PGE2 in particular38.

Our results indicate that gastric ulcer induced by EtOH is related with a significantly reduction on PGE2 levels, the treatment SSF at the dose of 3 ml/kg did not demonstrate a significant

protective effect instead the doses of 7.5 ml/kg and 15 ml/kg showed a significant protective effect in a dose dependent manner. Inflammatory response is responsible for the progressive

trigger and worsening of the gastric ulcer39. Then we evaluated the levels of the mayor inflammatory cytokines responsible for driving the inflammatory response in gastric ulcer such as

IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α40. Ours results showed a significant increased levels of these cytokines in EtOH group while the treatment SSF at the dose of 3 ml/kg did not demonstrate a significant

protective effect instead the doses of 7.5 ml/kg and 15 ml/kg showed a significant protective effect in a dose dependent manner in reducing the IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α levels. In conclusion

this study demonstrate for the first time the protective effect of intragastrical snail secretion filtrate, in a model of ethanol-induced gastric ulcer in mice. The gastric cytoprotective

action of snail secretion filtrate might be attributed to an increase or preservation of gastric mucus with preservation of mucosal mucopolysaccharides and collagen that which are also

reflected in a reduction of oxidative stress and induced inflammatory response. surely future studies are necessary to clarify the mechanism of action of this peculiar compound, however the

proven beneficial effects suggest its possible useful use in the treatment or prevention of gastric ulcer. METHODS SNAIL SECRETION FILTRATE (SSF) COLLECTION AND STERILIZATION Helix aspersa

muller mucus was kindly provided by Snail S.R.L.S (Messina, Italy). Briefly the breeding is cruelty free. In particular the mucus was obtained mechanically manually by stimulating snails by

sterile cotton swab tip. The mucus is filtered in a first step with a coarse filter stabilizing the pH, after this phase the mucus is passed in a filtration train consisting of 3 different

filters (10 micron-1micron -0.22-micron, Pall) and then stored at 4 °C. The use of the 0.22 micron filter is necessary to eliminate impurities and endotoxins in order to make the product

injectable. SNAIL SECRETION FILTRATE (SSF) CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION The crude Snail Secretion Filtrate extract from different batches, was qualitative and quantitative analyzed by

professional service for Snail S.R.L.S (Messina, Italy), (Science4Life srl, Messina Italy. and Sialab srl. Avola, Italy) using standard analytical techniques such as IR/UV vis spectrometry

and HPLC analysis to evaluate the protein quality and the allantoin and glycolic acid content respectively, and to obtain a qualitative determination of the total protein content and to a

Bradford assay (Bio-Rad) to evaluate the protein amount. Elastin and collagen were analyzed as seen previously41,42.All-trans-retinol, 13-cis-retinol,Vitamnin B12,Vitamin B3 were analyzed

according EN 12,823–1:2014, ISO20634:2015 and UNI EN 15,652:2009 respectively. All slime doses in experiments were subsequently calculated on microgram of proteins per milliliter (mg/mL)

content. ANIMALS CD1 mice (male, 20–30 g; Envigo) were accommodated in a standard location (room 22 °C and 12-h light/dark cycles) with standard rodent chow and water ad libitum. The animals

were adapted to these conditions for 1 week. Messina University Review Board for the care of animals approved the research. All animal experiments agree with the new regulations in Italy

(D.Lgs 2014/26), EU regulations (EU Directive 2010/63). All experimental were conducted in according to ARRIVE guidelines. ETHANOL-INDUCED ACUTE ULCER Ethanol-induced acute ulcer in mice

were performed as seen previously21,43. Briefly the mice were fasted for 24 h and divided into the follow group: * Control (n = 10): mice were treated by oral gavage with distilled water (15

 ml/Kg) * EtOH (n = 10): mice were treated by oral gavage with distilled water (15 ml/Kg) 1 h before ethanol-induced acute ulcer * Omeprazole 20 mg/Kg: mice were treated by oral gavage with

omeprazole at 20 mg/kg 1 h before ethanol-induced acute ulcer * SSF 3 ml/Kg: mice were treated by oral gavage with Snail Secretion Filtrate (SSF) at 3 ml/kg 1 h before ethanol-induced acute

ulcer * SSF 7.5 ml/kg: mice were treated by oral gavage with Snail Secretion Filtrate (SSF) at 7.5 before ethanol-induced acute ulcer * SSF 15 ml/Kg: mice were treated by oral gavage with

Snail Secretion Filtrate (SSF) at 15 ml/kg 1 h before ethanol-induced acute ulcer One hour after the oral treatment, acute ulcer was induced by orally EtOH (98% ethanol containing 150 mM

HCl) administration at 5 ml/kg. Control mice were treated with an equal volume of distilled water instead of EtOH solution. Animals were euthanized 1 h after treatment with the EtOH mixture,

under isoflurane inhalation anesthesia (5% in air. Baxter) by cervical dislocation. In this study due to the route of administration and maximum volume in ml/kg that can be given by o.s. in

mice21,28, we consider three dose of Snail Secretion Filtration (SSF) as high dose of 15 ml/kg, medium of 7.5 ml/kg and low 3 ml/kg, consider the proteins content in the SSF the respective

dosage as mg/kg were respectively 384 mg/kg, 192 mg/kg and 76.8 mg/kg. THE GASTRIC ULCER INDEX AND PREVENTIVE INDEX After sacrificing the animals, the stomachs were quickly removed and

washed with 0.9% saline. This was followed by macroscopic examination of the stomach for the detection of any hemorrhagic lesions on the glandular mucosa. The length in mm of each lesion was

measured to determine the mean ulcer index (UI)44. The length (mm) and the width (mm) of each band was measured by Vernier caliper. The degree of gastric mucosal lesions was evaluated from

digital pictures, and the severity of mucosal lesions was scored as follows: no ulcer (0 mm), 1–5 petechiae (< 1 mm) (1), 6–10 petechiae (< 1 mm) (2), > 10 petechiae (< 1 mm)

(3), small linear ulcer (< 2 mm) (2), medium linear ulcer (2–4 mm) (3), and large linear ulcer (> 4 mm) (4). If the width was > 1 mm, then the points were multi- plied by two. The

GU index (UI) was determined by adding the sum of the total of the scores and divided by the number of animals.The preventive index (PI) of pretreatments against ulceration was calculated

according to the following equation: $$ {\text{PI}} = \left( {{\text{UIethanol}} - {\text{UIpretreated}}} \right){\text{/UIethanol}} \times 100. $$ HISTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS For histological

assessment, the stomach was fixed in 10% (V/V) neutral buffered formalin solution, and then embedded in paraffin, sliced into 5 μm thicknesses, stained with hematoxylin–eosin (H&E)45.

The specimens were examined under an optical microscope (DM5500, Leica), and were assessed according to what has seen previously46. Histological section was assessed for epithelial cell loss

(score: 0–3), edema in the upper mucosa (score: 0–4), hemorrhagic damage (score: 0–4), and the presence of inflammatory cells (score: 0–3), yielding a maximum total score of 14. The

sections were assessed by an experienced pathologist who was blinded to the study. MEASUREMENT OF MUCOSA GLYCOPROTEINS AND COLLAGEN To further evaluate the mucosal lesions in the gastric

tissues, we performed mucosa glycoprotein measurements with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining according to the manufacturer's instructions (Bio-optica, Italy). The positive

glycoprotein site will appear as magenta color. Image J software was used for the determination of the positively stained area (pixel/field)47,48.Masson trichrome staining were performed

according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Bio-Optica, Milan, Italy). MEASUREMENT OF GASTRIC MUCUS CONTENTS Alcian blue (Sigma-Aldrich) binding assay was performed according to what seen

previosly49. After removing the stomach, some parts of the stomach were weighted and immersed in 10 mL of 0.02% Alcian blue and 0.16 M sucrose/0.05 M sodium acetate solution (pH 5.8) and

incubated at 25 °C for 24 h. The Alcian blue binding extract was centrifuged at 3000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 620 nm on a spectrophotometer.

Free mucus in the gastric content was calculated based on the amount of Alcian blue binding to the gastric mucus (mg/g of tissue). MYELOPEROXIDASE ACTIVITY Gastric tissues, were homogenized

and MPO activity was detected50,51. DETERMINATION OF MALONDIALDEHYDE (MDA) LEVEL Thiobarbituric. acid–reactant substances measurement was determined as a marker of lipid peroxidation.

Thiobarbituric acid–reactant substances were calculated by comparison the O.D. to a standard mixture of 1,1,3,3-tetramethoxypropan/99% malondialdehyde bis (dymethylacetal)/99% (MDA) (Sigma,

Milan, Italy). The absorbance of the supernatant was measured spectrophotometrically at 532 nm as seen previously52. DETERMINATION OF OXIDATIVE STRESS MARKERS AND BIOCHEMICAL DETERMINATIONS

SOD activity in the gastric tissue was determined using the Superoxide Dismutase Assay Kit (Cayman Chemicals) according to manufacturer’s protocols. CAT activity in the gastric tissue was

determined using the Catalase Assay Kit (Cayman Chemicals) according to manufacturer’s protocols. The supernatant of stomach tissue homogenate was subjected to measurement of PGE2 level

using an ELISA kit (Cayman chemicals) according to manufacturer protocols. IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α were measured using ELISA kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher) according to manufacturer protocols.

ANALYSIS OF PROTEIN PATTERN Analysis of protein pattern were performed as previously seen53. Total protein concentrations in extracts were determined by the Bradford method with bovine serum

albumin (BSA) as the standard. Then, SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis was performed on samples with equalized concentrations of total protein. In Particular 20 μl of samples was mixed with 20 

μl of Laemmli Sample Buffer with β-mercaptoethanol (Bio-Rad) and heating (95 °C, 5 min). then 40 μl of mixed samples and 5 μl of protein marker (Precision Plus Protein Dual Color Standards,

Bio-Rad) were loaded onto the gel and resolved, using the Mini-PROTEAN electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad). The protein bands, separated on gel, were fixed, stained in QC Colloidal Coomassie

Stain and destained solution according to the producer procedure (Bio-Rad). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS All values are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of N observations (N = 

10) or median with interquartile range for non-parametric data. Data were analyzed by Non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA followed by Dunn's multiple comparisons test, or

one-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test for multiple comparisons. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant: *p < 0.05 versus control; ◦p < 0.05 versus EtOH;

**p < 0.01 versus control; ◦◦p < 0.01 versus EtOH; ***p < 0.001 versus control; ◦◦◦p < 0.001 versus EtOH; #p < 0.05 versus omeprazole; ##p < 0.01 versus omeprazole; ###p 

< 0.001 versus omeprazole. DATA AVAILABILITY All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. REFERENCES * Kusters, J. G., van Vliet, A. H. &

Kuipers, E. J. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. _Clin. Microbiol. Rev._ 19, 449–490. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00054-05 (2006). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google

Scholar  * Li, L. F. _et al._ Cigarette smoking and gastrointestinal diseases: the causal relationship and underlying molecular mechanisms (review). _Int. J. Mol. Med._ 34, 372–380.

https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2014.1786 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Ma, S. H. _et al._ Impact of alcohol drinking on gastric cancer development according to Helicobacter

pylori infection status. _Br. J. Cancer_ 113, 1381–1388. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.333 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Allen, A. _et al._ Pepsins and

the mucus barrier in peptic ulcer disease. _Scand. J. Gastroenterol. Suppl._ 146, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365528809099130 (1988). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * _LiverTox:

Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury_ (2012). * Thomson, A. B., Sauve, M. D., Kassam, N. & Kamitakahara, H. Safety of the long-term use of proton pump

inhibitors. _World J. Gastroenterol._ 16, 2323–2330. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i19.2323 (2010). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Greistorfer, S. _et al._ Snail

mucus - glandular origin and composition in Helix pomatia. _Zoology (Jena)_ 122, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2017.05.001 (2017). Article  Google Scholar  * Pons, F., Koenig, M.,

Michelot, R., Mayer, M. & Frossard, N. The bronchorelaxant effect of helicidine, a Helix pomatia extract, interferes with prostaglandin E2. _Pathol. Biol. (Paris)_ 47, 73–80 (1999). CAS

  Google Scholar  * Tsoutsos, D., Kakagia, D. & Tamparopoulos, K. The efficacy of Helix aspersa Muller extract in the healing of partial thickness burns: a novel treatment for open burn

management protocols. _J. Dermatol. Treat._ 20, 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546630802582037 (2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Brieva, A. _et al._ Molecular basis for the regenerative

properties of a secretion of the mollusk _Cryptomphalus aspersa_. _Skin Pharmacol. Physiol._ 21, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1159/000109084 (2008). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  *

Bortolotti, D., Trapella, C., Bernardi, T. & Rizzo, R. Letter to the Editor: Antimicrobial properties of mucus from the brown garden snail Helix aspersa. _Br. J. Biomed. Sci._ 73, 49–50.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09674845.2016.1155377 (2016). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Gentili, V. _et al._ HelixComplex snail mucus as a potential technology against O3 induced skin

damage. _PLoS ONE_ 15, e0229613. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229613 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Rusanova, A. V. _et al._ Thrombin receptor

agonist Peptide immobilized in microspheres stimulates reparative processes in rats with gastric ulcer. _Bull. Exp. Biol. Med._ 142, 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-006-0285-y (2006).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * da Silva, D. M. _et al._ Effect of allantoin on experimentally induced gastric ulcers: Pathways of gastroprotection. _Eur. J. Pharmacol._ 821, 68–78.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.12.052 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Interdonato, M. _et al._ Levels of heavy metals in adolescents living in the industrialised area

of Milazzo-Valle del Mela (northern Sicily). _J. Environ. Public Health_ 2014, 326845. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/326845 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  *

Alberghina, M. _et al._ Cytoprotective effect of copper(II) complexes against ethanol-induced damage to rat gastric mucosa. _J. Inorg. Biochem._ 45, 245–259.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-0134(92)84013-d (1992). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Bonnemain, B. Helix and drugs: snails for western health care from antiquity to the present.

_Evid. Based Complem. Alternat. Med._ 2, 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/neh057 (2005). Article  Google Scholar  * Nj, N., OkontaJ, M., Co, E. & Aa, A. Anti-ulcer potentials of

phylum mollusca (tropical snail) slime. _Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med._ 2, 23–28 (2009). Google Scholar  * Salama, S. M. _et al._ A zinc morpholine complex prevents HCl/ethanol-induced gastric

ulcers in a rat model. _Sci. Rep._ 6, 29646. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29646 (2016). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Zhao, W. _et al._ Protective effects of

DIDS against ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury in rats. _Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai)_ 41, 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gmp014 (2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Yoo, J. H., Lee, J. S., Lee, Y. S., Ku, S. & Lee, H. J. Protective effect of bovine milk against HCl and ethanol-induced gastric ulcer in mice. _J. Dairy Sci._ 101, 3758–3770.

https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13872 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Erin, N., Turker, S., Elpek, O. & Yildirim, B. ADAM proteases involved in inflammation are

differentially altered in patients with gastritis or ulcer. _Exp. Ther. Med._ 15, 1999–2005. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.5619 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Drini, M.

Peptic ulcer disease and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. _Aust. Prescr._ 40, 91–93. https://doi.org/10.18773/austprescr.2017.037 (2017). * Arab, H. H., Salama, S. A., Omar, H. A., el

Arafa, S. & A. & Maghrabi, I. A. ,. Diosmin protects against ethanol-induced gastric injury in rats: novel anti-ulcer actions. _PLoS ONE_ 10, e0122417.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122417 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Thomas, D. _et al._ Cyperus rotundus L. prevents non-steroidal anti-inflammatory

drug-induced gastric mucosal damage by inhibiting oxidative stress. _J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol._ 26, 485–490. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2014-0093 (2015). * Lopez Angulo, D. E.

& do Amaral Sobral, P. J. Characterization of gelatin/chitosan scaffold blended with aloe vera and snail mucus for biomedical purpose. _Int. J. Biol. Macromol._ 92, 645–653.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.07.029 (2016). * Trapella, C. _et al._ HelixComplex snail mucus exhibits pro-survival, proliferative and pro-migration effects on mammalian

fibroblasts. _Sci. Rep._ 8, 17665. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35816-3 (2018). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Hull, R. M. Guideline limit volumes for

dosing animals in the preclinical stage of safety evaluation: Toxicology Subcommittee of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. _Hum. Exp. Toxicol._ 14, 305–307.

https://doi.org/10.1177/096032719501400312 (1995). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Rawlingson, A. _et al._ Functional significance of inducible nitric oxide synthase induction and

protein nitration in the thermally injured cutaneous microvasculature. _Am. J. Pathol._ 162, 1373–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63933-8 (2003). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed

Central  Google Scholar  * Lowe, P. P. _et al._ Correction: alcohol-related changes in the intestinal microbiome influence neutrophil infiltration, inflammation and steatosis in early

alcoholic hepatitis in mice. _PLoS ONE_ 12, e0179070. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179070 (2017). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Lima, Z. P. _et al._ Effects of

the ethyl acetate fraction of alchornea triplinervia on healing gastric ulcer in rats. _Pharmaceuticals (Basel)_ 4, 1423–1433. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph4111423 (2011). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Koo, M. W., Ogle, C. W. & Cho, C. H. Effects of verapamil, carbenoxolone and N-acetylcysteine on gastric wall mucus and ulceration in stressed rats. _Pharmacology_ 32,

326–334. https://doi.org/10.1159/000138188 (1986). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Indran, M., Mahmood, A. A. & Kuppusamy, U. R. Protective effect of _Carica papaya_ L leaf

extract against alcohol induced acute gastric damage and blood oxidative stress in rats. _West Indian Med. J._ 57, 323–326 (2008). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Liu, W. _et al._

Gastroprotective effects of chebulagic acid against ethanol-induced gastric injury in rats. _Chem. Biol. Interact._ 278, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2017.09.019 (2017). Article  CAS 

PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tandon, R., Khanna, H. D., Dorababu, M. & Goel, R. K. Oxidative stress and antioxidants status in peptic ulcer and gastric carcinoma. _Indian J. Physiol.

Pharmacol._ 48, 115–118 (2004). CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wallace, J. L. Prostaglandins, NSAIDs, and gastric mucosal protection: why doesn’t the stomach digest itself?. _Physiol. Rev._

88, 1547–1565. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00004.2008 (2008). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yu, C., Mei, X. T., Zheng, Y. P. & Xu, D. H. Gastroprotective effect of taurine

zinc solid dispersions against absolute ethanol-induced gastric lesions is mediated by enhancement of antioxidant activity and endogenous PGE2 production and attenuation of NO production.

_Eur. J. Pharmacol._ 740, 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.07.014 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Konturek, S. J., Konturek, P. C. & Brzozowski, T.

Prostaglandins and ulcer healing. _J. Physiol. Pharmacol._ 56(Suppl 5), 5–31 (2005). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Sipponen, P. & Maaroos, H. I. Chronic gastritis. _Scand. J. Gastroenterol._

50, 657–667. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2015.1019918 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Li, W. _et al._ The gastroprotective effect of nobiletin against

ethanol-induced acute gastric lesions in mice: impact on oxidative stress and inflammation. _Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol._ 39, 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923973.2017.1379088

(2017). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Akin, C. Mast cell activation syndromes. _J. Allergy Clin. Immunol._ 140, 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.06.007 (2017). Article  CAS

  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Neuman, R. E. & Logan, M. A. The determination of collagen and elastin in tissues. _J. Biol. Chem._ 186, 549–556 (1950). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Oyagi, A., Ogawa, K., Kakino, M. & Hara, H. Protective effects of a gastrointestinal agent containing Korean red ginseng on gastric ulcer models in mice. _BMC Complement. Altern. Med._

10, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-10-45 (2010). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Li, Q. _et al._ Kaempferol protects ethanol-induced gastric ulcers in mice via

pro-inflammatory cytokines and NO. _Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai)_ 50, 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gmy002 (2018). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Pizzino, G. _et al._

Blockade of the JNK signalling as a rational therapeutic approach to modulate the early and late steps of the inflammatory cascade in polymicrobial sepsis. _Mediat. Inflamm._ 2015, 591572.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/591572 (2015). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Li, W. _et al._ Anti-ulcerogenic effect of cavidine against ethanol-induced acute gastric ulcer in mice and

possible underlying mechanism. _Int. Immunopharmacol._ 38, 450–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2016.06.016 (2016). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Collins, T. J. ImageJ for

microscopy. _Biotechniques_ 43, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.2144/000112517 (2007). Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Coelho, I. P. _et al._ Chemical profile and gastroprotective

effect of Jatropha elliptica (Pohl) Oken roots. _Fitoterapia_ 146, 104707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2020.104707 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Ribeiro, A. R. _et

al._ The effects of baicalein on gastric mucosal ulcerations in mice: protective pathways and anti-secretory mechanisms. _Chem. Biol. Interact._ 260, 33–41.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2016.10.016 (2016). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Fusco, R. _et al._ Absence of formyl peptide receptor 1 causes endometriotic lesion regression in a

mouse model of surgically-induced endometriosis. _Oncotarget_ 9, 31355–31366. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25823 (2018). * Irrera N., _et al._ Activation of A2A receptor by PDRN

reduces neuronal damage and stimulates WNT/β-CATENIN driven neurogenesis in spinal cord. _Front Pharmacol._ 9, 506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00506 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed 

PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Cordaro, M. _et al._ Adelmidrol, a palmitoylethanolamide analogue, as a new pharmacological treatment for the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

_Mol. Pharmacol._ 90, 549–561. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.116.105668 (2016). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Matusiewicz, M. _et al._ In vitro influence of extracts from snail helix

aspersa muller on the colon cancer cell line caco-2. _Int J. Mol. Sci._ https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041064 (2018). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  Download references

AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * These authors contributed equally: Enrico Gugliandolo, Marika Cordaro and Roberta Fusco. AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Chemical, Biological,

Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Via F. Stagno D’alcontres 31, 98166, Messina, Italy Marika Cordaro, Roberta Fusco, Alessio Filippo Peritore, Rosalba

Siracusa, Tiziana Genovese, Ramona D’Amico, Daniela Impellizzeri, Rosanna Di Paola & Salvatore Cuzzocrea * School of Medicine, 1402 South Grand Blvd, St Louis, MO, 63104, USA Salvatore

Cuzzocrea * Department of Veterinary Science, University of Messina, Viale Annunziata, 98168, Messina, Italy Enrico Gugliandolo & Rosalia Crupi Authors * Enrico Gugliandolo View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Marika Cordaro View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Roberta Fusco

View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Alessio Filippo Peritore View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google

Scholar * Rosalba Siracusa View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Tiziana Genovese View author publications You can also search for this

author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ramona D’Amico View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Daniela Impellizzeri View author publications You can

also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Rosanna Di Paola View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Salvatore Cuzzocrea View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Rosalia Crupi View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS

E.G. conceived of the study and drafted the manuscript. M.C. drafted the manuscript. R.F., A.F.P. and D.I. carried out the experiments, revised the manuscript and performed the statistical

analysis. R.D.P. R.C. and S.C. designed the study and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence to Rosanna

Di Paola or Salvatore Cuzzocrea. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER'S NOTE Springer Nature remains

neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 1. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This

article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as

you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party

material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the

article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the

copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Gugliandolo, E., Cordaro,

M., Fusco, R. _et al._ Protective effect of snail secretion filtrate against ethanol-induced gastric ulcer in mice. _Sci Rep_ 11, 3638 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83170-8

Download citation * Received: 14 May 2020 * Accepted: 29 January 2021 * Published: 11 February 2021 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83170-8 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the

following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer

Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative