News Reader.info

WHAT HAPPENED President Bush over the weekend vetoed a bill that would have effectively banned waterboarding by barring interrogation techniques not allowed in the Army Field Manual. But CIA

Director Michael Hayden said the move wouldn’t change much, because U.S. interrogation programs “are fully consistent with the Geneva Convention and current U.S. law, and are most certainly

not torture." (_U.S. News & World Report_) WHAT THE COMMENTATORS SAID SUBSCRIBE TO THE WEEK Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple

perspectives. SUBSCRIBE & SAVE SIGN UP FOR THE WEEK'S FREE NEWSLETTERS From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly

to your inbox. From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox. “Congress must overturn this odious veto,” said the

_Seattle Post-Intelligencer_ in an editorial. “Claiming, as Bush does, that treating these suspects worse than we do any other sort of criminal is somehow justifiable in that it might

prevent terrorist attacks is specious at best.” The end doesn’t justify the means. In dealing with terrorists, it certainly does, said the Harrisonburg, Va., _Daily News-Record_ in an

editorial. These are people “who consider innocent civilians to be legitimate targets and who gleefully shout that they love death more than Westerners love life.” Interrogators don’t always

have “the luxury of time” when trying to get answers to thwart the next attack. “Splashing water over a terrorist’s face to gain life-saving information is quick, effective, and hardly

heinous.” Following the Army Field Manual wouldn’t keep interrogators from aggressively questioning prisoners, said _The New York Times_ in an editorial. “It simply forbids the use of

techniques that are regarded by most civilized people as abuse and torture, including sexual abuse, electric shocks, mock executions and the infamous form of simulated drowning known as

waterboarding.” Bush “misled” Americans by saying waterboarding is necessary and legal, so we’ll have to wait for the next president to “restore the rule of law.” Please put that “shopworn

torture narrative” to rest, said _National Review_ in an editorial. All Bush’s “sound veto” did was resist an effort to hand al Qaida “the full menu” of our interrogation options so they

could train terrorists how to resist. This isn’t about any particular method; it’s about keeping extremists guessing so interrogations will be effective. Besides, “waterboarding, or

simulated drowning, is rough stuff, but it should not be mistaken for the heinous cruelty that sensible people recognize as genuine torture.” A free daily email with the biggest news stories

of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com