News Reader.info

“Russia has won,” said Teodor Marjanovic in the Czech Republic’s _Mlada Fronta Dnes._ Faced with Russian objections, the U.S. last week announced that it was canceling its plan to build a

missile defense system in the Czech Republic and Poland to protect against a nuclear attack from Iran. When the Bush administration announced the project, in 2007, the Czech and Polish

governments did all they could to persuade their reluctant citizenry that the system would make them more secure by sheltering them under the American nuclear umbrella. But now, President

Barack Obama has “destroyed our prospect of a safer future in one move, as if flicking a crumb from his desk.” For us, the missile shield wasn’t just a defense against Iran. Since it would

be manned by U.S. troops and in effect require U.S. bases in our countries, the shield was “a vital insurance policy against Russia’s expanding imperial appetites.” So much for that. When

Obama came to Prague last spring, he promised that the U.S. “would never turn its back on the people of this nation.” But that’s exactly what he just did. Let this be a wakeup call to

Eastern Europe, said Kamil Durczok in Poland’s _Polska._ In Poland, in particular, we’ve been unquestioningly subservient to the United States ever since we shook off communism. We had

“become a kind of American outpost,” to the detriment of our relations with Western Europe. Yet for Obama, Eastern Europe is obviously “not a top priority.” Rather than placing all our hope

in a missile shield “that was always more virtual than real anyway,” we “may want to learn how to build alliances with our neighbors.” That would be the best outcome, said Richard Werly in

Switzerland’s _Le Temps._ The proposed defense system “symbolized the unilateralism” of the Bush administration and was therefore unpopular across Europe. Bush offended NATO by skirting the

alliance to create his own missile shield, and he drove a wedge between Eastern and Western Europe by enlisting the Easterners in his plan. Worse, he insulted Russia by placing his proposed

new bases on former Warsaw Pact territory. Obama’s wise decision to abandon the project can allow those “wounds” to heal. The question now is “whether this lucidity will be copied in

Russia.” Will the Russians accept Obama’s overture and “return to a less aggressive position”? SUBSCRIBE TO THE WEEK Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis

from multiple perspectives. SUBSCRIBE & SAVE SIGN UP FOR THE WEEK'S FREE NEWSLETTERS From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week

delivered directly to your inbox. From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox. Scrapping missile defense is

hardly a concession to Russia, said Victor Litovkin in Russia’s _Nezavisimaya Gazeta._ Missile defense has never been proved to work, and besides, it is very expensive. The U.S. had already

poured $50 billion into research, and at least $60 billion more would have been required to install the system in Eastern Europe. That’s probably why it was a favorite of U.S. defense

companies and the Pentagon officials in their pockets. But with the current financial crisis, Obama can’t afford to “waste money” on a system that is just “ethereal propaganda.” In short, it

was in the U.S.’s own interest to backtrack on missile defense—which is why Russia certainly has no need to make any concessions in return. A free daily email with the biggest news stories

of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com